2025-cv-01760

2025-cv-01760 Atari Interactive, Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A

Date :2/20/2025
Court :Northen District of Illinois
Law FirmGBC

#

Date

Document

1

Feb. 20, 2025

COMPLAINT filed by Atari Interactive, Inc.; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23108246.

Exhibit 1

2

Feb. 20, 2025

SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Atari Interactive, Inc. Schedule A regarding complaint[1]

3

Feb. 20, 2025

MOTION by Plaintiff Atari Interactive, Inc. for leave to file under seal

4

Feb. 20, 2025

CIVIL Cover Sheet

5

Feb. 20, 2025

NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Atari Interactive, Inc.

6

Feb. 20, 2025

Notice of Claims Involving Trademarks by Atari Interactive, Inc.

7

Feb. 20, 2025

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Atari Interactive, Inc. by Justin R. Gaudio

8

Feb. 20, 2025

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Atari Interactive, Inc. by Amy Crout Ziegler

9

Feb. 20, 2025

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Atari Interactive, Inc. by Marcella Deshonda Slay

10

Feb. 20, 2025

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Atari Interactive, Inc. by Luana Faria De Souza (Faria De Souza, Luana)

Feb. 20, 2025

CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John F. Kness. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2).

11

Feb. 21, 2025

MAILED Trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA

12

Feb. 21, 2025

MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials

13

Feb. 21, 2025

MOTION by Plaintiff Atari Interactive, Inc. for temporary restraining order including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Asset Restraint, and Expedited Discovery

14

Feb. 21, 2025

MEMORANDUM by Atari Interactive, Inc. in support of motion for temporary restraining order 13

15

Feb. 21, 2025

DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion 14

16

Feb. 21, 2025

DECLARATION of Ted Biderman regarding memorandum in support of motion 14

(Exhibit 1)

17

Feb. 21, 2025

SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Atari Interactive, Inc. Exhibit 2 regarding declaration 16

(Exhibit 2)

18

Feb. 21, 2025

MOTION by Plaintiff Atari Interactive, Inc. for Electronic Service of Process Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3)

19

Feb. 21, 2025

MEMORANDUM by Atari Interactive, Inc. in support of motion for miscellaneous relief 18

20

Feb. 21, 2025

DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion 19

21

March 25, 2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: On the Court's initiative, all pending motions are held in abeyance, and the case is stayed pending further order. This stay, which the Court is entering in other so-called "Schedule A" cases on its docket where requests for temporary restraining orders remain pending, is intended to permit the Court the opportunity to reassess its previous approach in Schedule A litigation involving Lanham Act, Copyright Act, and Patent Act claims typically brought on an ex parte basis against various online merchants. This reassessment will consider, among other things, whether: (1) ex parte proceedings are appropriate in these types of cases; (2) the routine sealing of parts or all of the docket is appropriate; (3) the routine granting of temporary restraining orders on an ex parte basis is a sound exercise of judicial discretion; (4) the routine granting of prejudgment asset restraints is a sound exercise of judicial discretion; and (5) the mass joinder of defendants is appropriate under the circumstances typically present in Schedule A cases. Plaintiff remains free, of course, to dismiss this action voluntarily if they wish to pursue their claims in another District, but no supplemental briefing on the pending motions may be filed absent advance leave of Court. Mailed notice.

22

April 2, 2025

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Atari Interactive, Inc.

23

April 2, 2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Plaintiff has filed a "Notice of Dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1)" 22. Because the Notice of Dismissal was filed before the opposing parties served either an answer or a motion for summary judgment, the case is dismissed without prejudice consistent with the terms of the Notice and by operation of Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Nelson v. Napolitano, 657 F.3d 586, 587 (7th Cir. 2011) (Rule 41(a)(1)(A) notice of dismissal "is self-executing and effective without further action from the court"). Each party is to bear its own fees and costs. All pending motions are dismissed as moot except for the motion to seal 3, which is granted. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice.

联系我们

企业微信及自我推荐2