2025-cv-02471

COMPLAINT filed by The Liverpool Football Club and Athletic Grounds Limited; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23182199.

Exhibit 1

SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff The Liverpool Football Club and Athletic Grounds Limited Schedule A regarding complaint 1

MOTION by Plaintiff The Liverpool Football Club and Athletic Grounds Limited for leave to file under Seal

CIVIL Cover Sheet

NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by The Liverpool Football Club and Athletic Grounds Limited

Notice of Claims Involving Trademarks by The Liverpool Football Club and Athletic Grounds Limited

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff The Liverpool Football Club and Athletic Grounds Limited by Justin R. Gaudio

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff The Liverpool Football Club and Athletic Grounds Limited by Amy Crout Ziegler

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff The Liverpool Football Club and Athletic Grounds Limited by Trevor Christian Talhami

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff The Liverpool Football Club and Athletic Grounds Limited by Jennifer Van Nacht

CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Georgia N Alexakis. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Heather K. McShain. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2).

CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.

MAILED Trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA.

(List of Trademarks, Ex. 1)

MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials.

AMENDED complaint by The Liverpool Football Club and Athletic Grounds Limited against Shenzhen Opto365 Technology Co., Ltd., the Individuals and Entities Operating Shenzhen OPTO365 Technology Co., Ltd. and terminating The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A

Exhibit 1

Exhibit 2

EXHIBIT by Plaintiff The Liverpool Football Club and Athletic Grounds Limited Schedule A regarding amended complaint, [13]

Notice of Withdrawal of Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal [3] by The Liverpool Football Club and Athletic Grounds Limited

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Georgia N Alexakis: In light of plaintiff's notice of withdrawal 15, plaintiff's motion for leave to file under seal 3 is denied as moot.

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Georgia N Alexakis: Initial status hearing is set for 5/12/25 at 9:30 a.m. in person in Courtroom 1719. By 5/5/25,the parties shall file a Joint Initial Status Report that complies with the Court's standing order, which can be found on the Court's website. If the defendant(s) have not been served by the initial status hearing date, counsel for Plaintiff must contact the Courtroom Deputy to reschedule the status hearing and the date for filing the Joint Initial Status Report.

MOTION by Plaintiff The Liverpool Football Club and Athletic Grounds Limited for discovery Expedited

(Exhibit 1)

MOTION by Plaintiff The Liverpool Football Club and Athletic Grounds Limited for Electronic Service of Process Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3)

MEMORANDUM by The Liverpool Football Club and Athletic Grounds Limited in support of motion for miscellaneous relief 19

DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion 20

NOTICE of Motion by Justin R. Gaudio for presentment of motion for discovery 18, motion for miscellaneous relief 19 before Honorable Georgia N Alexakis on 5/8/2025 at 09:30 AM.

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Georgia N Alexakis: The Court grants plaintiff's motions for leave to conduct expedited discovery 18 and for electronic service of process 19. No appearance is required on 5/8/25. The Court finds that expedited discovery is warranted to better identify defendants. The Court also finds that electronic service does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it is an effective way to communicate with the online marketplace defendants. The Court decides these issues, however, without the benefit of adversarial presentation. If any defendant were to appear and object, the Court will take a fresh look at the issues of electronic service and expedited discovery as well as any issues related to personal jurisdiction. Enter Order, as modified by the Court. The Court vacates the initial status hearing set for 5/12/25 and the 5/5/25 deadline for submitting a joint initial status report 17. A status report is now due on 6/5/25 and should be filed by plaintiff even if no defendant has entered an appearance by that date. Mailed notice

ORDER Signed by the Honorable Georgia N Alexakis on 5/5/2025.Mailed notice

SUMMONS Submitted (Court Participant) for defendant(s) Shenzhen OPTO365 Technology Co., Ltd. and the Individuals and Entities Operating Shenzhen OPTO365 Technology Co., Ltd. by Plaintiff The Liverpool Football Club and Athletic Grounds Limited

SUMMONS Issued (Court Participant) as to Defendant The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A

SUMMONS Returned Executed by The Liverpool Football Club and Athletic Grounds Limited as to Shenzhen Opto365 Technology Co., Ltd. on 5/9/2025, answer due 5/30/2025; the Individuals and Entities Operating Shenzhen OPTO365 Technology Co., Ltd. on 5/9/2025, answer due 5/30/2025.

Declaration of Trevor C. Talhami

(Exhibit A)

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by The Liverpool Football Club and Athletic Grounds Limited as to Shenzhen OPTO365 Technology Co., Ltd.

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Georgia N Alexakis:Per plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal 28, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), defendant Shenzhen OPTO365 Technology Co., Ltd. is dismissed without prejudice. Civil case terminated.