2025-cv-02970

COMPLAINT (REDACTED) filed by XYZ Corporation; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23237956.

Exhibit 1

(Exhibit 1)(Sullivan, Ann Marie)

(Exhibit 3 - Schedule A, Part 2)(Sullivan, Ann Marie)

Exhibit 4 - Part 2

Declaration of Ann Marie Sullivan

Declaration in Support of Memorandum

Declaration in Support of Memorandum

Exhibit 2 - Part Two

(Declaration of Alison K. Carter)

(Declaration of Ann Marie Sulivan)

Declaration of Service

Exhibit 1

(Exhibit A & Exhibit B)(Sullivan, Ann Marie)

(Exhibit 1)

Exhibit 1

Exhibit Schedule-A

Declaration of Alison K. Carter

Exhibit 1

Exhibit Ex. 1 - Declaration of Yi He

(REDACTED) (Corrected) AMENDED complaint by XYZ Corporation against The Partnerships Identified on Schedule A

(Exhibit 2 - Schedule A)

(Exhibit 4 - Part 3)(Sullivan, Ann Marie)

Exhibit 1 - 3

(Exhibit 1-2)(Sullivan, Ann Marie)

(Exhibit 1)(Sullivan, Ann Marie)

(Exhibit 2 - Part Three)(Sullivan, Ann Marie)

Exhibit 1

Exhibit 2

Exhibit 2

Exhibit 2

COMPLAINT by Plaintiff XYZ Corporation Complaint (Unredacted) Modified on 5/2/2025.

(Exhibit 4)(Sullivan, Ann Marie)

Exhibit 2

(Exhibit 3)

Exhibit 3

Exhibit 3

CIVIL Cover Sheet

Exhibit 3

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff XYZ Corporation by John Joseph Mariane, IV

(Exhibit 4)

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff XYZ Corporation by Alison K Carter

CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Beth W. Jantz. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3). (Text entry; no document attached.)

CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (Text entry; no document attached.)

NEW PARTIES: Tales.com, Inc. added to case caption. Terminating XYZ Corporation (Sullivan, Ann Marie) (Text entry; no document attached.)

SUMMONS - ERROR UNPROCESSED due to The caption of the summons form does not match the caption on the face of the amended complaint (name of defendant). (Text entry; no document attached.)

SUMMONS - ERROR UNPROCESSED due to Case caption on Summons must match case caption on Amended Complaint. (Text entry; no document attached.)

NEW PARTIES: Unique Baby Store, Dropship Pro Store, Cuty Babybling Store, Winnie Baby Store, Pedido Yampi Store, Minzhizhen-YY Store, YUKI Personal Care Store, TOP Smart Accessory Store, Sunlly Store, The Baby Boutique Store, SSweet1128 Store, Shop1102988550 Store, Shop1103029145 Store, MOJOYCE Speciality Bag Store, Shop1103289122 Store, Fashionable bags online Store, Sportin Outdoors Store, All-category Store, Home-Treasure Store, Shop1103349090 Store, Wall Ker OutdoorParts Store, Shop1103411023 Store, Digital & Stationery Store, Ali Choice Direct Sales Store, LUCK Lucky Store, MOJOYCE Factory Store, All Categories Factory 01 Store, Audio Video Equipment Store, Shop1103850473 Store, Choice For Dropshipping Store, Shop1103886787 Store, GMY Special Store, DIY Dream World Store, Keep Positive Store, X Electronics Store, Carcareb Store, Shop1104381090 Store, Baitong (Def. No. 38), XinXinStore, Fangoo US, xiexiaorong-us, XUZHANGLIN, dilisi, JM Trustmay, Lion-shop (Def. No. 45), DONOTGO, Doolmin Direct, A little Luck, TianRui-US, JIUDOYN, Kindmin US, Zuukhard, DYKay, NNANZI, HOWHYUE, GANZHOUHONGCHENG, ZHAOLIANGCHANGHALUBAMAO, LHYUCYC, IMOLL, MNUYE, Yangfan US, candisea, Freshopping (Arrival in 7-15 days), Chuxvif-US, Yisquar, YAFANTING, JoyfulHao, zxbaers, 7-12 delivery Dream Xi Co., Ltd., JIANGJIANGMAOYI, Nottnnut Store, BWFDR, Soup with Pepper (Def. No. 79), xz1123, dealimpacts, emporio_de_excelencia, LevelUp Epic Case Quest, LORBY SHOP BY ANGARA, official_crownmarket, sha-728766, skypmac, Yu W, XIN CHU, jinyu store, WJQ Household Products, STAFKIRE, Mai Long, Haidar, Halo Hopo, HallvarDr and JOKIY added to case caption. Terminating The Partnerships Identified on Schedule A (Text entry; no document attached.)

NEW PARTIES: SEEF, WinnieYe, NASELECT, ASKMall, Tsuch, Tupai Selection, Bezos Board Game, Noah shop, FIAMMAGIC, ForFunGift, VESPA Decor, CUUKSHKN SHOP, HDGS, OnlyToys, MLQIDK, Sharp Cow, ManYuanPeiShangMao, MAIJIU, Shishijiutonggemaoyiyouxianzerengongsi, NEWPOWER, YIDU Co.Ltd and TBKOMH added to case caption. (Text entry; no document attached.)

MAILED Copyright request letter to counsel of record.

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: The Court will not allow this case to proceed pseudonymously. No-name litigation is disfavored in general, and the Seventh Circuit has repeatedly voiced disfavor of parties proceeding anonymously, as anonymous litigation runs contrary to the rights of the public to have open judicial proceedings. The Court is not convinced that the circumstances described in Plaintiff's filing are exceptional; hundreds of other "Schedule A" cases proceed without anonymity and the Court cannot see why this case is any different. Upon review of the complaint, the Court sua sponte raises the propriety under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 20(a)(2) of joining 222 defendants to this action, and dismisses the complaint. See, e.g, Estee Lauder Cosmetics Ltd. v. Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, 334 F.R.D. 182 (N.D. Ill. 2020). Plaintiff may file an amended complaint that supports the joinder of multiple defendants and it must ensure that its submissions demonstrate a likelihood of success as to each Defendant on the asserted claims. Plaintiff should also ensure that its submissions support the exercise of personal jurisdiction as to each defendant; in this regard, the mere maintenance of a website, even a fully interactive website accessible in Illinois, remains insufficient. E.g., Advanced Tactical Ordnance Sys., LLC v. Real Action Paintball, Inc., 751 F.3d 796, 803 (7th Cir. 2014) ("Having an interactive website. should not open a defendant up to personal jurisdiction in every spot on the planet where that interactive website is accessible."); Rubik's Brand, Ltd. v. Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, No. 20-CV-5338, 2021 WL 825668, at *3 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 4, 2021) (screenshot evidence showing that an order could be placed by an Illinoisan, "amounts to nothing more than maintaining an interactive website that is accessible in Illinois," and "that alone cannot confer personal jurisdiction."). An amended complaint (in Plaintiff's name) with joinder principles in mind must be filed by March 25, 2025. Failure to do so by this deadline will result in dismissal without prejudice. Mailed notice.

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff XYZ Corporation by Ann Marie Sullivan (Sullivan, Ann Marie)

MOTION by Plaintiff XYZ Corporation for leave to file Certain Documents Under Seal (Sullivan, Ann Marie)

AMENDED complaint by Tales.com, Inc. against All Defendants

AMENDED SCHEDULE A to the Complaint by Plaintiff Tales.com, Inc. Exhibit 2 - Amended Schedule A Modified on 5/2/2025.

SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Tales.com, Inc. Exhibit 4 - Part 1

MEMORANDUM Establishing That Joinder is Proper by Plaintiff Tales.com, Inc. Memorandum Establishing That Joinder is Proper Modified on 5/2/2025.

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: The Clerk is directed to update the case caption to reflect that Plaintiff is Tales.com, Inc. Mailed notice.

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: The motion to seal 10 is granted. Plaintiff should review the Court's standing order on "Schedule A" Cases, available at https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/judge-info.aspx?IuUaWzNcEoPr4PHl9tvcGaMUezk8AnJ1 under the "Case Procedures" tab. As explained there, Plaintiff must complete and file the template linked on that page before the Court will consider granting any motion for preliminary injunctive relief. The submission must also provide a listing of all prior Schedule A cases filed in any court in the United States in which Plaintiff was a plaintiff, and a listing of any of the defendants included in the Schedule A in this case that Plaintiff has previously named as a defendant in any prior complaint or Schedule A case. Finally, by filing the template, Plaintiff certifies that Plaintiff has not used any of the screenshot evidence supplied in support of a motion for a TRO in this case in any prior proceeding. If the template is not completed by April 2, 2025, the Court may dismiss this matter for failure to prosecute. Mailed notice.

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: With reluctance, the Court permits the case to proceed as currently joined with a smaller subset of Defendants. Plaintiff has already filed the required template for Schedule A cases, so a status report or appropriate motion as to next steps is due by March 31, 2025. Mailed notice.

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Tales.com, Inc. by Gouthami Vanam Tufts

MOTION by Plaintiff Tales.com, Inc.for Electronic Service of Process (Sullivan, Ann Marie)

MEMORANDUM by Tales.com, Inc. in support of motion for miscellaneous relief 19 for Electronic Service of Process

MOTION by Plaintiff Tales.com, Inc. for temporary restraining order (Sullivan, Ann Marie)

MEMORANDUM by Tales.com, Inc. in support of motion for temporary restraining order 21

EXHIBIT 2 by Plaintiff Tales.com, Inc. Exhibit 2 - Part One Modified on 5/2/2025.

ORDER by the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins on 4/1/2025.Mailed notice. Modified on 5/2/2025.

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER. Signed by the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins on 4/1/2025. Mailed notice. Modified on 5/2/2025.

SUMMONS Submitted (Court Participant) for defendant(s) by Plaintiff Tales.com, Inc.

SURETY BOND in the amount of $ 10,000 posted by Tales.com, Inc. (Document not scanned)

SUMMONS Submitted (Court Participant) for defendant(s) by Plaintiff Tales.com, Inc.

SUMMONS Submitted (Court Participant) for defendant(s) The Partnerships Identified on Schedule A by Plaintiff Tales.com, Inc.

SUMMONS Issued (Court Participant) as to Defendant The Partnerships Identified on Schedule A

MOTION by Plaintiff Tales.com, Inc. for extension of time for Temporary Restraining Order

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: The motion to extend the TRO 31 is granted. The TRO is extended to April 29, 2025. Mailed notice.

NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Tales.com, Inc.

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Cryfokt, beasnanier-US, Prexey, Likeets, mjkvf68, Mouqikon, Chuxvif by Timothy Tiewei Wang

MOTION by Plaintiff Tales.com, Inc. for preliminary injunction

MEMORANDUM by Tales.com, Inc. in support of motion for preliminary injunction 35

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tales.com, Inc. as to The Partnerships Identified on Schedule A on 4/24/2025, answer due 5/15/2025.

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for entry of a preliminary injunction. In connection with that motion, Plaintiff must serve all remaining Defendants with the following statement: "The Court has taken the motion for a preliminary injunction under advisement and will consider the motion unopposed if no Defendant appears and objects by May 1, 2025." If no objections are filed by that date, the Court will consider the motion unopposed. Plaintiff must serve this minute order upon all remaining Defendants within one business day of its entry on the docket and must promptly file proof of that service. For the reasons stated in the Court's orders entering the TRO, the TRO is extended until the Court adjudicates the motion for a preliminary injunction. See H-D Mich., LLC v. Hellenic Duty Free Shops S.A., 694 F.3d 827, 843-45 (7th Cir. 2012). Because this extension exceeds the maximum duration for a TRO under FRCP 65(b), this extension "becomes in effect a preliminary injunction that is appealable, but the order remains effective." Id. at 844. Mailed notice

CERTIFICATE of Service of Minute Order 38 by Gouthami Vanam Tufts on behalf of Tales.com, Inc.

RESPONSE by VIta Home&Decor to MOTION by Plaintiff Tales.com, Inc. for preliminary injunction 35 (Received via Box.com 4/28/25)

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant land scape by Timothy Alan Duffy

NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by land scape

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Plaintiff's reply to the objection filed by Defendant Vita Home&Dcor 40 is due by May 9, 2025. Mailed notice.

OBJECTIONS by land scape to MOTION by Plaintiff Tales.com, Inc. for preliminary injunction 35

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: The Clerk is requested to unseal any previously-sealed documents. Defendant Land scape has appeared in the case and requested access to unsealed documents, which the Court has now granted. By May 9, 2025, Plaintiff must file a statement on the docket explaining its compliance with the Court's standing order on Schedule A cases [see docket 8 ], including the requirement that Plaintiff list any defendants included in the Schedule A in this case that Plaintiff has previously named as a defendant in any prior complaint or Schedule A case. If compliance with the Court's standing order was not accomplished, Plaintiff must explain why not. The submission must expressly address the matters raised by Defendant Land scape regarding Case No. 25-cv-2707. Defendant Land scape's response memorandum to the motion for a preliminary injunction is due by May 16, 2025 and any reply is due by May 23, 2025. Mailed notice.

STATEMENT by Tales.com, Inc. in Response to Minute Entry 45

REPLY by Plaintiff Tales.com, Inc. to response to motion 40 for entry of preliminary injunction

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Fangoo by Timothy Tiewei Wang

MOTION by Defendants Chuxvif, Cryfokt, Fangoo, Likeets, Mouqikon, Prexey, beasnanier-US, mjkvf68 for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint 1 Unopposed

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: The unopposed motion for an extension of time 49 is granted. Defendants Chuxvif, Cryfokt, Fangoo, Likeets, Mouqikon, Prexey, beasnanier-US, mjkvf68's responsive pleading is now due by June 5, 2025. Mailed notice.

RESPONSE by land scapein Opposition to MOTION by Plaintiff Tales.com, Inc. for preliminary injunction [35]

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Bvlltings by Yong Chen

MOTION by Defendant Bvlltings for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint[1], UNOPPOSED

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Tales.com, Inc. with prejudice as to certain Defendants

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Defendant Bvlltings' unopposed motion for an extension of time [53] is granted. Defendant Bvlltings' responsive pleading is now due by June 4, 2025. Mailed notice.

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Tales.com, Inc. with prejudice as to certain Defendants

REPLY by Tales.com, Inc. to response in opposition to motion[51] for preliminary injunction

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: As between Plaintiff and Defendant land scape, the court declines to deny the motion for a preliminary injunction as a sanction. When Plaintiff filed a lawsuit in March 2025, it was assigned Case No. 25-cv-2707, and the judge assigned to that case ordered that the case could only proceed against a smaller subset of defendants. Plaintiff amended that complaint, and also filed a new action against the previously dismissed defendants in this case. This posture was disclosed to this court in the filing at docket entry 12-1. It was not improper for Plaintiff to proceed against dismissed defendants in a new case considering that the judge in Case No. 25-cv-2707 concluded that the defendants had been misjoined in the first place. The court does not view this as forum shopping. As to the merits, Plaintiff alleges that Defendant land scape has infringed Plaintiff's Copyright U.S. Reg. No. TX 9-456-834, which protects the design and the text of the "Tale's Life Story Interview Kit (Questions)." In deciding a motion for a preliminary injunction in a patent case, district courts apply Federal Circuit law instead of the law of the circuit in which they sit because the motion "involves substantive matters unique to patent law." Revision Mil., Inc. v. Balboa Mfg. Co., 700 F.3d 524, 525 (Fed. Cir. 2012). "To obtain a preliminary injunction, a party must show that it is likely to succeed on the merits, that it is likely to suffer irreparable harm in the absence of preliminary relief, that the balance of equities tips in its favor, and that an injunction is in the public interest." Luminara Worldwide, LLC v. Liown Elecs. Co., 814 F.3d 1343, 1352 (Fed. Cir. 2016) (quoting Winter v. Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 20 (2008)). "The first two factorslikelihood of success on the merits and irreparable harmare the most critical in a patent case, and a court may deny a motion for a preliminary injunction if 'a party fails to establish either of the[se] two critical factors.'" Pressure Specialist, Inc. v. Next Gen Mfg. Inc., 469 F. Supp. 3d 863, 868 (N.D. Ill. 2020) (quoting Reebok Int'l Ltd. v. J. Baker, Inc., 32 F.3d 1552, 1556 (Fed. Cir. 1994)). Here, based on Plaintiff's submissions, including at Exhibits 1 through 3 (dkt. 57), Plaintiff has established a likelihood of success on the merits. At the very least, the product Plaintiff purchased from Defendant land scape as depicted in those images establishes that the copyright is being used without authorization. It is not accurate to say that 24Defendant's game card images differ from the copyrighted images, nor are the questions presented on the front of the cards meaningfully different. (See 57-3, depicting similar colors on similar cards with nearly identical questions). Defendant does not argue that Plaintiff will not suffer irreparable harm, and the court concludes that Plaintiff is likely to suffer irreparable harm in the absence of preliminary relief. Finally, Defendant requests a modification of the $8,200 asset restraint that is currently in place. The court agrees with Defendant that the amount currently restrained includes funds that Defendant obtained from the sales of other products completely unrelated to this case which were not alleged to be infringing, so a reduction of the restraint is appropriate. The current restraint is modified to reflect that any funds in excess of $2,500 must be released immediately. The motion for a preliminary injunction [35] is granted and Plaintiff must submit a revised proposed order to the court's PO Box by May 30, 2025. Mailed notice.

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: By June 9, 2025, Plaintiff shall file a status report regarding next steps in this case. If Plaintiff intends to file a motion for default judgment, it should be filed by that date, and if Plaintiff moves for default judgment as to all Defendants, no status report need be filed. Mailed notice.

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: The motion for a preliminary injunction [35] is granted. For the reasons set forth in plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, as well as the reasons provided by plaintiff in connection with the Court's earlier entry of the TRO, the Court is persuaded that plaintiff has satisfied the requirements for a preliminary injunction, including that the balance of harms favors plaintiff and that a preliminary injunction serves the public interest by, among other things, protecting consumers from the marketing of counterfeit goods. Enter preliminary injunction order. The Clerk shall unseal any documents that are sealed. The Law Firm of Sullivan & Carter, LLP, is ordered to add ALL defendant names listed in the Schedule A to the docket within five business days, instructions can be found on the Court's website at https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/_assets/_documents/_forms/_cmecf/pdfs/v60/Add_Terminate_Instructions.pdf Mailed notice.

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Signed by the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins on 5/30/2025. Mailed notice.

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Tales.com, Inc. with prejudice as to certain Defendant

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Tales.com, Inc. with prejudice as to certain Defendants

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Tales.com, Inc. without prejudice as to certain Defendants

MOTION by Plaintiff Tales.com, Inc. for entry of default as to certain Defendants, MOTION by Plaintiff Tales.com, Inc. for default judgment as to as to certain Defendants

MEMORANDUM by Tales.com, Inc. in support of motion for entry of default, motion for default judgment, [65] as to certain Defendants

STATUS Report, per ECF [59], by Tales.com, Inc.

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: ManYuanPeiShangMao, Sharp Cow, TBKOMH, XUZHANGLIN, FIAMMAGIC and MNUYE terminated.Mailed notice.

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: As between Plaintiff and Defendants 40. Fangoo US; 51. JIUDOYN; 59. HOWHYUE; 73. zxbaers; 76. Bvlltings; and 114. OnlyToys, a stipulation of dismissal is due by July 10, 2025. If these parties need more time to finalize their settlement arrangements beyond this date, the court will dismiss the action without prejudice and the dismissal will automatically convert to a dismissal with prejudice in the ninety-day time frame described in the status report. Mailed notice.

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: The following order does not apply to Defendants 40. Fangoo US; 51. JIUDOYN; 59. HOWHYUE; 73. zxbaers; 76. Bvlltings; and 114. OnlyToys. Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for entry of default and default judgment against all Defendants. All remaining defendants have failed either to plead or to otherwise appear to defend against this action. Accordingly, default is entered under Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Any objections to the motion for entry of default judgment must be filed on or before June 17, 2025. If no objections are filed by that date, the court will consider the motion unopposed. The Court will also rule on the papers unless a hearing is requested by June 13, 2025. A hearing may be requested by filing a Request for Hearing as a separate entry on the docket. Plaintiff must serve this minute order upon all remaining Defendants within one business day of its entry on the docket and must promptly file proof of that service. Mailed notice.

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant YIDU Co.Ltd by He Cheng

MOTION by Defendant Fangoo for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint[1] Unopposed

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Defendant Fangoo's unopposed motion for extension of time [72] is granted. This Defendant's responsive pleading is now due by June 26, 2025. Mailed notice.

CERTIFICATE of Service of Minute Order [70] by Gouthami Vanam Tufts on behalf of Tales.com, Inc.

MOTION by Defendant YIDU Co.Ltd to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction

Request for Hearing by YIDU Co.Ltd

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Plaintiff's response to Defendant YIDU Co.Ltd's motion to dismiss is due by June 23, 2025 Plaintiff should first consult this court's opinion issued in Feng v. The Partnerships, 24 CV 8963, Dkt. 48 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 4 2025) and Rubik's Brand, Ltd. v. The Partnerships, 2021 WL 825668, at *4 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 4, 2021) (no personal jurisdiction over a defendant where only connection to the forum was operating an online marketplace that had "the possibility" of shipping to Illinois). Any reply is due by June 30, 2025. Mailed notice.

LETTER from Adle Atakishyeva dated 6/12/2025.

LETTER from Adle Atakishyeva dated 6/12/2025.

LETTER from Adle Atakishyeva dated 6/12/2025.

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Tales.com, Inc. with prejudice as to certain Defendants

OBJECTION TO ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT by Yan Xie. (Received vi Box.com 6/16/25)

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: The following order does not apply to Defendant 121 YIDU Co.Ltd, Defendant 40. Fangoo US; Defendant 51. JIUDOYN; Defendant 59. HOWHYUE; or Defendant 73. Zxbaers. No remaining Defendant has responded to Plaintiff's motion for entry of default judgment. Accordingly, the motion [65] is granted. Enter Final Judgment Order as to certain Defendants. Mailed notice.

FINAL JUDGMENT ORDER. Signed by the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins on 6/17/2025. Mailed notice.

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Yisquar by Adam Edward Urbanczyk

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Tales.com, Inc. with prejudice as to certain Defendants

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Tales.com, Inc. without prejudice as to a certain Defendant

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: In light of the notice of dismissal [87] the motion to dismiss [75] is denied as moot. Defendant YIDU Co.Ltd is terminated from the case. Mailed notice.

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Plaintiff shall file a statement by July 1, 2025 updating the court on the objection to default filed by Yan Xie. This Defendant does not appear to be listed in the default judgment order issued by the court in this case, but Plaintiff should clarify and provide appropriate information concerning settlement. Mailed notice.

MOTION by Defendant Fangoo for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint[1] Unopposed

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Defendant Fangoo's motion for an extension of time [90] is granted. Defendant Fangoo's response is now due by July 17, 2025. Mailed notice.

FULL SATISFACTION of Judgment as to certain Defendant

STATEMENT by Tales.com, Inc. pursuant to Minute Entry Order [89]

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: An objection was filed at docket entry [84] pro se by Yan Xie who purports to be owner of Doolmin Direct. The filing objected to the entry of default, but the court has already entered the order of default. If Doolmin Direct wishes to file a motion to vacate default, it must do so through a lawyer who is licensed to practice law in the United States. Yan Xie is not a licensed lawyer to Xie cannot represent Doolmin Direct. Mailed notice.

FULL SATISFACTION of Judgment as to certain Defendant

STATUS Report and Statement in Response to [69] by Tales.com, Inc. (Sullivan, Ann Marie)

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Based on the status report, the only remaining Defendant, Fangoo US, has until July 17, 2025 to answer or otherwise plead. If the parties reach a settlement, or if no responsive pleading is filed by July 17, 2025, Plaintiff must take appropriate steps to move the case forward by no later than July 21, 2025. Mailed notice.

FULL SATISFACTION of Judgment as to certain Defendant

LETTER from emporio_de_excelencia. (Received via Box.com on 07/16/25)

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Defendant Fangoo's responsive pleading was not filed by the July 17, 2025 deadline, therefore the court enters default under FRCP 55(a). Plaintiff's motion for default judgment under FRCP 55(b) is to be filed no later than July 23, 2025. Mailed notice.

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Tales.com, Inc. without prejudice as to the remaining Defendant

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Beth W. Jantz: Pursuant to the voluntary dismissal as to the last remaining Defendant [101] there is nothing remaining for the court to do. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice.

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Tales.com, Inc. with prejudice as to certain Defendant

FULL SATISFACTION of Judgment as to certain Defendant

FULL SATISFACTION of Judgment as to certain Defendant

LETTER from Adle Atakishyeva. (Received via Pro se portal 9/15/25)

FULL SATISFACTION of Judgment as to certain Defendant