2025-cv-03943

2025-cv-03943 Bang Bang Merchandise LLP v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A

Date :4/12/2025
Court :Northen District of Illinois
Law FirmAronberg Goldgehn

#

Date

Document

1

April 14, 2025

COMPLAINT filed by Bang Bang Merchandise LLP; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23345044.

Exhibit A

5

April 14, 2025

MOTION by Plaintiff Bang Bang Merchandise LLP for leave to file Certain Documents Under Seal

6

April 14, 2025

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Bang Bang Merchandise LLP by Sofia Quezada Hastings (Quezada Hastings, Sofia)

April 14, 2025

CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Martha M. Pacold. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Maria Valdez. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2).

CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.

7

April 15, 2025

MAILED Trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA.

8

April 15, 2025

MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials.

9

April 16, 2025

AMENDED complaint by Bang Bang Merchandise LLP against The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A

(Exhibit A)

10

April 16, 2025

SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Bang Bang Merchandise LLP Schedule A regarding amended complaint 9

11

April 16, 2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion to seal, 5, is denied. Plaintiff requests that the court seal the complaint and plaintiff's exhibits "until such time as the Court holds a hearing on Plaintiff's anticipated Motion for Preliminary Injunction." Id. at 1. Plaintiff seeks to prevent defendants from learning about this action because if the defendants learn of this action prior to a preliminary injunction hearing, defendants may take steps to "conceal, destroy, and/or alter records relating to the infringing products." Id. at 2. However, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(a)(1), "[t]he court may issue a preliminary injunction only on notice to the adverse party." Thus, plaintiff cannot seek to prevent defendants from learning about this suit until this court holds a hearing on a preliminary injunction motion, as issuance of a preliminary injunction requires notice to defendants. Plaintiff otherwise does not explain how or why sealing is warranted in this case. Thus, plaintiff's motion to seal, 5, is denied. Plaintiff's sealed exhibits, 2, 10, are stricken. If plaintiff wishes to proceed with this case, plaintiff must file its exhibits publicly on the docket by 4/24/2025.

12

April 24, 2025

EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Bang Bang Merchandise LLP Unsealed Schedule A to Amended Complaint regarding exhibit 10 (Quezada Hastings, Sofia)

13

April 25, 2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff has filed an unsealed amended Schedule A. 12. Plaintiff is directed to file a status report by 5/2/2025, updating the court on how it seeks to proceed in this litigation.

14

May 1, 2025

MOTION by Plaintiff Bang Bang Merchandise LLPfor Electronic Service of Process

Supplement Memorandum in Support

(Declaration of Karolina Jozwiak)

15

May 1, 2025

MOTION by Plaintiff Bang Bang Merchandise LLP to expedite discovery

16

May 6, 2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion for electronic service of process, 14, is granted. The court finds that electronic service of process is proper under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3). Electronic service of process does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it effectively communicates the pendency of this action to defendants. To the extent that the motion requests service of process of any temporary restraining order in this case, see id. at 2, no temporary restraining order has been issued.

17

May 6, 2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion for expedited discovery, 15, is granted in part and denied in part. Enter Order.

18

May 6, 2025

ORDER Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 5/6/2025:

22

June 3, 2025

ORDER : The Clerk of the Court is directed to issue a single original summons in the name of "Hangzhou Sobuy Technology Co., Ltd." Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 6/3/2025. Mailed notice

24

June 16, 2025

SUMMONS Issued (Court Participant) as to Hangzhou Sobuy Technology Co., Ltd.

25

June 16, 2025

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Bang Bang Merchandise LLP as to The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A on 6/16/2025, answer due 7/7/2025.

26

June 20, 2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff is directed to file a status report by 6/27/2025 addressing how plaintiff seeks to proceed with this litigation.

27

June 27, 2025

STATUS Report by Bang Bang Merchandise LLP

28

July 14, 2025

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Bang Bang Merchandise LLP of Remaining Defendant

29

July 15, 2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court has received plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal, 28, which lists the only defendant named in the operative schedule A, 12. This dismissal took effect without court intervention. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i); Waetzig v. Haliburton Energy Servs., 145 S. Ct. 690, 694 (2025). Civil case terminated.

联系我们

企业微信及自我推荐2