2025-cv-04859

2025-cv-04859 Fendi S.R.L. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A et al

Date :5/2/2025
BrandFENDI 芬迪
Court :Northen District of Illinois
Law FirmGBC

#

Date

Document

1

May 2, 2025

COMPLAINT filed by Fendi S.R.L.; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23433404.

Exhibit 1

Exhibit 2

Exhibit 3

(Exhibit 4)

2

May 2, 2025

CIVIL Cover Sheet

3

May 2, 2025

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Fendi S.R.L. by Paul Joseph Kossof

4

May 2, 2025

MOTION by Plaintiff Fendi S.R.L. to seal Complaint, Schedule A to the Complaint, Declaration of Philip G. Groves Addressing Joinder, and Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of Nicolas Lambert

5

May 2, 2025

NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Fendi S.R.L.

6

May 2, 2025

SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Fendi S.R.L. Schedule A

7

May 2, 2025

Notice of Claim Involving Trademarks by Fendi S.R.L.

8

May 2, 2025

Trademark Report by Fendi S.R.L.

9

May 2, 2025

DECLARATION of Nicolas Lambert

(Exhibit 1)

10

May 2, 2025

SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Fendi S.R.L. Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of Nicolas Lambert

11

May 2, 2025

DECLARATION of Paul Kossof

Exhibit 1

Exhibit 2

(Exhibit 3)

12

May 2, 2025

SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Fendi S.R.L. Declaration of Phil Groves Addressing Joinder

13

May 2, 2025

MOTION by Plaintiff Fendi S.R.L. for temporary restraining order

Supplement Memorandum in Support of Motion for Temporary Restraining Order

(Text of Proposed Order Proposed Temporary Restraining Order)

14

May 2, 2025

MOTION for Electronic Service by Fendi S.R.L. Modified on 5/5/2025.

Supplement Memorandum in Support of Motion for Electronic Service

Declaration Declaration of Paul Kossof in Support of Motion for Electronic Service

Exhibit Exhibit 1 to Declaration of Paul Kossof in Support of Motion for Electronic Service

(Exhibit Exhibit 2 to Declaration of Paul Kossof in Support of Motion for Electronic Service)

May 2, 2025

CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John F. Kness. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeannice W. Appenteng. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2).

CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.

15

May 5, 2025

MAILED Trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA

16

May 5, 2025

MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials

17

May 7, 2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: On the Court's initiative, all pending motions are held in abeyance, and the case is stayed pending further order. This stay, which the Court is entering in other so-called "Schedule A" cases on its docket where requests for temporary restraining orders remain pending, is intended to permit the Court the opportunity to reassess its previous approach in Schedule A litigation involving Lanham Act, Copyright Act, and Patent Act claims typically brought on an ex parte basis against various online merchants. This reassessment will consider, among other things, whether: (1) ex parte proceedings are appropriate in these types of cases; (2) the routine sealing of parts or all of the docket is appropriate; (3) the routine granting of temporary restraining orders on an ex parte basis is a sound exercise of judicial discretion; (4) the routine granting of prejudgment asset restraints is a sound exercise of judicial discretion; and (5) the mass joinder of defendants is appropriate under the circumstances typically present in Schedule A cases. Plaintiff remains free, of course, to dismiss this action voluntarily if they wish to pursue their claims in another District, but no supplemental briefing on the pending motions may be filed absent advance leave of Court. Mailed notice.

18

May 23, 2025

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Fendi S.R.L.

19

May 23, 2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Plaintiff has filed a "Notice of Dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1)" 18. Because the Notice of Dismissal was filed before the opposing parties served either an answer or a motion for summary judgment, the case is dismissed without prejudice consistent with the terms of the Notice and by operation of Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Nelson v. Napolitano, 657 F.3d 586, 587 (7th Cir. 2011) (Rule 41(a)(1)(A) notice of dismissal "is self-executing and effective without further action from the court"). Each party is to bear its own fees and costs. All pending motions are dismissed as moot except for the motion to seal 4, which is granted. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice.

20

May 27, 2025

MAILED Trademark report with certified copy of minute order dated 5/23/2025 to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA

联系我们

企业微信及自我推荐2