2025-cv-07558

COMPLAINT filed by Fuzhou Minhou FanShiLiu Trading Co., Ltd.; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23711164.

Exhibit 1

(Exhibit 1)

Declaration of Zhiwei Hua in Support of Motion for Electronic Service

(Exhibit Screenshot of Service Email)

SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Fuzhou Minhou FanShiLiu Trading Co., Ltd. trademark registration regarding complaint 1

Exhibit 2

Exhibit 1 of Declaration of Hua

SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Fuzhou Minhou FanShiLiu Trading Co., Ltd. Schedule A regarding complaint 1

(Exhibit 3)

(Exhibit 2 of Declaration of Hua)

SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Fuzhou Minhou FanShiLiu Trading Co., Ltd. Genuine Listing regarding complaint 1

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Fuzhou Minhou FanShiLiu Trading Co., Ltd. by Zhiwei Hua

CIVIL Cover Sheet

CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Albert Berry, III. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). (Text entry; no document attached.)

CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (Text entry; no document attached.)

AMENDED exhibit 3, complaint 1 Amended Schedule A

MEMORANDUM in support of Ex Parte Motion for leave to conduct expedited discovery 8

MOTION by Plaintiff Fuzhou Minhou FanShiLiu Trading Co., Ltd. Electronic Service of Process Pursuant to FRCP 4(f)(3)

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Plaintiff's ex parte motion for leave to conduct expedited discovery 8 and motion for electronic service of process 10 are granted as to Defendant No. 1 in Amended Schedule A. Electronic service of process does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it effectively communicates the pendency of this action to defendant. Expedited discovery is warranted to identify the individuals or business entities who own and/or operate the e-commerce store under the seller alias, the nature of their operations, all associated sales, and the financial accounts used for their operations. By 8/27/2025, Plaintiff shall file a status report with an update on the case. Telephone status hearing is set for 9/3/2025 at 9:15 a.m. The call-in number is (855) 244-8681 and the access code is 172 628 1276##. Attorneys of record may not use speakerphones during the status hearing. Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing but will be placed on mute. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Mailed notice

ORDER FOR LEAVE TO CONDUCT EXPEDITED DISCOVERY AND SERVICE OF PROCESS BY E-MAIL AND/OR ELECTRONIC PUBLICATION Signed by the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani on 7/17/2025. Mailed notice

SUMMONS Issued (Court Participant) as to Defendant The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Fuzhou Minhou FanShiLiu Trading Co., Ltd. as to The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A on 7/22/2025, answer due 8/12/2025.

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: No remaining defendant has responded to plaintiff's motion for entry of default judgment. Accordingly, the motion [19] is granted. Based on the evidence previously submitted by plaintiff and the admission of liability by virtue of the default, plaintiff has established that a permanent injunction should be entered. The infringement of plaintiff's marks irreparably harms plaintiff and confuses the public. This infringement was willful and statutory damages are awarded. After considering the nature of the products, the price point, the absence of any concrete evidence of lost profits or high-volume infringement by defendants (plaintiff has failed to seek an accounting of profits), the value of plaintiff's brand, and the need to deter infringement that is easily committed and difficult to stop, the Court concludes that $50,000 is an appropriate award of statutory damages. Plaintiff has also certified and established [22] that it provided electronic notice to defendants of the objection deadline, but no objection to the motion for entry of default judgment has been filed on behalf of any defendant. Enter separate Final Default Judgment Order. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice

FINAL DEFAULT JUDGMENT ORDER Signed by the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani on 9/4/2025. Mailed notice