2025-cv-08187

COMPLAINT filed by Amy Brown; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23765905.

Exhibit 1

Exhibit 2

Exhibit 3

(Exhibit 4)

SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Amy Brown Schedule A to Complaint 1

CIVIL Cover Sheet

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Amy Brown by Keith A. Vogt

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Amy Brown by Yanling Jiang

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Amy Brown by Adam Grodman

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Amy Brown by Cameron Eugene Mcintyre

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Amy Brown by Monica Rita Martin

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Amy Brown by Yi Bu

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Amy Brown by Christopher Romero

CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Martha M. Pacold. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Albert Berry, III. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3).

CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.

MAILED copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC

Amended Schedule A to the Complaint 1 and Schedule A 2 by Amy Brown

MOTION by Plaintiff Amy Brown for Electronic Service of Process Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3)

MEMORANDUM by Amy Brown in support of motion for miscellaneous relief 13

Exhibit 1

Declaration of Keith A. Vogt

(Exhibit 1-2, of Keith A. Vogt's declaration)

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion for electronic service of process, 13, is granted. The court finds that electronic service of process is proper under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3). Electronic service of process does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it effectively communicates the pendency of this action to defendants.

SUMMONS Issued (Court Participant) as to Defendant The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Amy Brown as to The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A on 8/1/2025, answer due 8/22/2025.

(Declaration of Service, Keith A. Vogt)

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Amy Brown as to the Defendant(s) Identified in Amended Schedule A

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court has received plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal, 37. This dismissal took effect without court intervention. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i); Waetzig v. Haliburton Energy Servs., 145 S. Ct. 690, 694 (2025). Civil case terminated.