# |
Date |
Document |
---|---|---|
1 |
July 17, 2025 |
COMPLAINT filed by Chengliang Wang; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23766293. Exhibit 1 Exhibit 2 (Exhibit 3) |
2 |
July 17, 2025 |
SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Chengliang Wang trademark registration regarding complaint 1 |
3 |
July 17, 2025 |
SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Chengliang Wang Schedule A regarding complaint 1 |
4 |
July 17, 2025 |
SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Chengliang Wang Genuine Listing regarding complaint 1 |
5 |
July 17, 2025 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Chengliang Wang by Zhiwei Hua |
6 |
July 17, 2025 |
CIVIL Cover Sheet |
July 18, 2025 |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). (qrtr,) CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (qrtr,) |
|
7 |
July 18, 2025 |
MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA |
8 |
July 18, 2025 |
MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials |
9 |
July 21, 2025 |
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: This case has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman. Plaintiff has filed a complaint alleging infringement by 88 defendants. This case follows a pattern common to "Schedule A" cases where plaintiffs allege that defendants employ similar methods and "work in active concert" to infringe plaintiffs' intellectual property. But experience has shown that not all defendants named in a Schedule A case work together. More importantly, experience has shown that joinder under Fed. R. Civ. P. 19 and 20 is rarely appropriate in Schedule A cases. Accordingly, the Court raises the propriety of joinder and requires the plaintiff to file a supplemental memorandum addressing the propriety of joinder at least 7 days before the filing of the motion for temporary restraining order. Alternatively, by the same date, Plaintiff may file an amended complaint and amended Schedule A reducing the number of defendants. However, if Plaintiff names multiple defendants, Plaintiff must show that joinder of those defendants is proper. The Court directs Plaintiff to this Court's standing order in Schedule A cases regarding joinder on the Court's website. Mailed notice. |
10 |
July 21, 2025 |
NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Chengliang Wang |
11 |
July 22, 2025 |
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), this case is dismissed without prejudice. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. |
12 |
July 23, 2025 |
MAILED Closing Trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA. (Closing Minute Entry dated 7/22/2025) |