2025-cv-09782

COMPLAINT filed by Wham-O Holding, Ltd., Intersport Corp.; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number BILNDC-23895014.

Exhibit 1 - TM Registrations

Exhibit 2 - CBP

Exhibit 3 - IP Rights

(Exhibit 4 - DHS)

CIVIL Cover Sheet

SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiffs Intersport Corp., Wham-O Holding, Ltd. -- Schedule A to the Complaint -- regarding complaint, 1

MOTION by Plaintiffs Intersport Corp., Wham-O Holding, Ltd. to seal document exhibit 3

(Exhibit A)

NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Intersport Corp., Wham-O Holding, Ltd.

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Intersport Corp., Wham-O Holding, Ltd. by Matthew A. Werber

EMAILED Trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA

CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Georgia N. Alexakis. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2).

CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.

EMAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Georgia N. Alexakis: The Court grants plaintiff's motion for leave to file certain documents under seal 4. Upon review of the complaint, the Court sua sponte raises the propriety of joining 99 defendants in a single action. By 9/3/25, plaintiff must file a supplemental memorandum addressing the propriety of joinder in light of this Court's orders in Bug Art Limited v. The Partnerships, 24 CV 7777, Dkt. 28 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 28, 2024), and Anagram International v. The Partnerships, 24 CV 12194, Dkt. 87 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 21, 2025). In the alternative, plaintiff has leave to file an amended complaint by 9/3/25 with a smaller subset of defendants along with a memorandum explaining why that smaller subset of defendants is properly joined. No motion for an ex parte temporary restraining order should be filed in this matter without counsel first consulting this Court's order in Wham-O Holding v. The Partnerships, 24 CV 12523, Dkt. 39 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 20, 2025).

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Intersport Corp., Wham-O Holding, Ltd. by Peter Krusiewicz

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Georgia N. Alexakis: Initial status hearing is set for 10/30/25 at 9:30 a.m. in person in Courtroom 1719. By 10/23/25, the parties shall file a Joint Initial Status Report that complies with the Court's standing order, which can be found on the Court's website. If the defendant(s) have not been served by the initial status hearing date, counsel for Plaintiff must contact the Courtroom Deputy to reschedule the status hearing and the date for filing the Joint Initial Status Report.

AMENDED complaint by Wham-O Holding, Ltd., Intersport Corp. against afasgasdf and terminating The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified in Schedule A Hereto

Exhibit 1 - TM Registrations

Exhibit 2 - CBP

Exhibit 3 - IP Rights

Exhibit 4 - DHS

(-- Amended Schedule A --)

MOTION by Plaintiffs Intersport Corp., Wham-O Holding, Ltd. MOTION FOR EXPEDITED DISCOVERY AND ELECTRONIC SERVICE

Declaration of Matthew A. Werber

Exhibit A - Amazon Pages

Exhibit B - Hague

Exhibit C - Temu

Exhibit D - printout

(Unpublished)

NOTICE of Motion by Matthew A. Werber for presentment of motion for miscellaneous relief, 13 before Honorable Georgia N. Alexakis on 8/28/2025 at 09:30 AM.

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Georgia N. Alexakis: Plaintiff's motions for expedited discovery and electronic service of process are granted 13. No appearance is required on 8/28/25. The Court finds that expedited discovery is warranted to identify defendants. The Court also finds that electronic service does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it is an effective way to communicate with the online marketplace defendants. The Court decides these issues, however, without the benefit of adversarial presentation. If any defendant were to appear and object, the Court will take a fresh look at the issues of electronic service and expedited discovery as well as any issues related to personal jurisdiction. Enter Order, as modified by the Court.

ORDER granting motion for expedited discovery and electronic service Signed by the Honorable Georgia N. Alexakis on 8/26/25.

SUMMONS Issued (Court Participant) as to Defendant afasgasdf (qrtr,)