# |
Date |
Document |
---|---|---|
1 |
Aug. 26, 2025 |
COMPLAINT filed by Bounce Curl, LLC; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23944368. Exhibit 2 Exhibit 1 Exhibit 1 |
2 |
Aug. 26, 2025 |
SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Bounce Curl, LLC Schedule A regarding complaint[1] Exhibit 2 |
3 |
Aug. 26, 2025 |
SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Bounce Curl, LLC Exhibit 1 - Parts 1-2 regarding complaint[1] (Exhibit 3) |
4 |
Aug. 26, 2025 |
MOTION by Plaintiff Bounce Curl, LLC for leave to file under seal |
5 |
Aug. 26, 2025 |
CIVIL Cover Sheet |
6 |
Aug. 26, 2025 |
NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Bounce Curl, LLC |
7 |
Aug. 26, 2025 |
Notice of Claims involving Patents by Bounce Curl, LLC |
8 |
Aug. 26, 2025 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Bounce Curl, LLC by Justin R. Gaudio |
9 |
Aug. 26, 2025 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Bounce Curl, LLC by Amy Crout Ziegler |
10 |
Aug. 26, 2025 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Bounce Curl, LLC by Andrew Daniel Burnham |
11 |
Aug. 26, 2025 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Bounce Curl, LLC by Jennifer Van Nacht |
12 |
Aug. 27, 2025 |
MAILED patent report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA. |
Aug. 27, 2025 |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Beth W. Jantz. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 1). (Text entry; no document attached.) CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (Text entry; no document attached.) |
|
13 |
Aug. 29, 2025 |
AMENDED complaint by Bounce Curl, LLC against Xiamenshisinakadianzishangwudiangerenduzi, the Individuals and Entities Operating Xiamenshisinakadianzishangwudiangerenduzi and terminating The Partnerships And Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A |
14 |
Aug. 29, 2025 |
EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Bounce Curl, LLC Amended Schedule A regarding amended complaint, [13] |
15 |
Sept. 4, 2025 |
Notice of Withdrawal of Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal [4] by Bounce Curl, LLC |
16 |
Sept. 4, 2025 |
MOTION by Plaintiff Bounce Curl, LLC for discovery Expedited |
17 |
Sept. 4, 2025 |
MOTION by Plaintiff Bounce Curl, LLC for Electronic Service of Process Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3) |
18 |
Sept. 4, 2025 |
MEMORANDUM by Bounce Curl, LLC in support of motion for miscellaneous relief[17] |
19 |
Sept. 4, 2025 |
DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion[18] |
20 |
Sept. 4, 2025 |
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings: This case has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Jeffrey I. Cummings. Plaintiff's motion for leave to file under seal [4] is granted. On or before 11/4/25, the parties shall file a joint initial status report in accordance with the template available on the Court's website under the case management procedure titled "Initial Status Report for Newly Filed Cases." The parties shall also review all of the case management procedures and standing orders available on the Court's website, including the Court's case management procedure for motions to dismiss. Initial tracking status hearing set for 11/14/25 at 9:00 a.m. to track the case only (no appearance is required and the case will not be called). Instead, the Court will review the parties' joint initial status report and enter further orders as appropriate. Mailed notice. |
21 |
Sept. 8, 2025 |
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings: Plaintiff's motion for expedited discovery [16] and motion for electronic service of process [17] are granted. Electronic service of process does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it effectively communicates the pendency of this action to defendants. Expedited discovery is warranted to identify defendants. Enter Order. Mailed notice |
22 |
Sept. 8, 2025 |
ORDER Signed by the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings on 9/8/2025:Mailed notice |