2025-cv-10389

COMPLAINT filed by Capcom Co., Ltd.; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23966300.

Exhibit 1

Exhibit 1

Exhibit 1

Declaration of Martin F. Trainor

SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Capcom Co., Ltd. Schedule A regarding complaint[1]

Exhibit 2

Exhibit 2

Exhibit 1

MOTION by Plaintiff Capcom Co., Ltd. for Leave to File Certain Documents Under Seal

Exhibit 3

Exhibit 3

CIVIL Cover Sheet

Exhibit 4

Exhibit 4

NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Capcom Co., Ltd.

Exhibit 5

Exhibit 5

Notice of Claims Involving Trademarks by Capcom Co., Ltd.

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Capcom Co., Ltd. by Martin Francis Trainor

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Capcom Co., Ltd. by Sydney Paige Fenton

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Capcom Co., Ltd. by Alexander Whang

CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Jeremy C. Daniel. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Maria Valdez. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). (Text entry; no document attached.)

CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (Text entry; no document attached.)

NEW PARTIES: Chenyangfan SHOP added to case caption. Terminating The Partnerships And Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A (Text entry; no document attached.)

MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA.

MAILED copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC.

MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials.

Notice of Withdrawal of Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal by Capcom Co., Ltd.

AMENDED complaint by Capcom Co., Ltd. against Chenyangfan SHOP

EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Capcom Co., Ltd. Schedule A regarding amended complaint[14]

MOTION by Plaintiff Capcom Co., Ltd. for Expedited Discovery

MOTION by Plaintiff Capcom Co., Ltd. for Electronic Service of Process Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3)

MEMORANDUM by Capcom Co., Ltd. in support of motion for miscellaneous relief[17]

NOTICE of Motion by Martin Francis Trainor for presentment of motion for miscellaneous relief[16], motion for miscellaneous relief[17] before Honorable Jeremy C. Daniel on 9/9/2025 at 09:30 AM.

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeremy C. Daniel: The plaintiff's motion to seal [3] is denied as moot. The plaintiff's motion for expedited discovery [16] is granted as follows: the plaintiff may serve third-party Roadget Business PTE. Ltd. and Shein with a subpoena seeking documents sufficient to identify the individuals and entities associated with the online marketplace identified in Schedule A, to include all names, addresses, telephone numbers, and email addresses associated with the online marketplace. While the plaintiff's motion seeks to serve expedited discovery on five additional third-parties, there is nothing in the record supporting such relief. The Court cautions the plaintiff against seeking relief not warranted by the record. Further, The plaintiff's motion for electronic service of process [17] is denied without prejudice. At this point, the plaintiff does not know what identifying information the defendant provided to the third-party platform and only suspects that the defendant is located overseas. The Court sees no reason to allow the plaintiff's speculation to prevail when the plaintiff has discovery tools available to it that will allow it to answer some of those questions. The motion hearing is stricken. Mailed notice.

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeremy C. Daniel: Any party to this action has until October 23, 2025, to justify the continued need to seal any documents in this case. The Court intends to unseal all documents in this case after that date. Mailed notice.