2025-cv-10969

COMPLAINT filed by Dyson Technology Limited; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-24049250.

Exhibit 2

SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited Schedule A regarding complaint[1]

SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited Exhibit 1 regarding complaint[1]

(Exhibit 1-1)

MOTION by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited for leave to file under seal

CIVIL Cover Sheet

NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Dyson Technology Limited

Notice of Claims Involving Patents by Dyson Technology Limited

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited by Justin R. Gaudio

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited by Lawrence J. Crain

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited by Justin Tyler Joseph

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited by Andrew Daniel Burnham

CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 1). (Text entry; no document attached.)

CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (Text entry; no document attached.)

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Motion for leave to file under seal [4] is granted. Mailed notice.

MAILED Patent report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA

MOTION by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited for temporary restraining order including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Asset Restraint, and Expedited Discovery

MEMORANDUM by Dyson Technology Limited in support of motion for temporary restraining order[14]

SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited Exhibit 1 regarding memorandum in support of motion[15]

DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion[15]

DECLARATION of Giles Samuel Lane regarding memorandum in support of motion[15]

Exhibit 1

SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited Exhibit 2 regarding declaration[18]

MOTION by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited for Electronic Service of Process Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3)

MEMORANDUM by Dyson Technology Limited in support of motion for miscellaneous relief[20]

DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion[21]

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: The Court requires that any motion for a temporary restraining order and/or asset freeze is accompanied by a declaration from an attorney of record that provides the following information. First, to demonstrate the immediate harm necessary to grant the drastic remedy of an ex parte temporary restraining order, the declaration must confirm that each named defendant has sold or offered to sell the allegedly infringing product(s) within the last two months and describe the evidence supporting this confirmation. Generally, evidence that a defendant has sold or offered to sell the infringing products within the last two months may include: (1) screenshots of the listings collected within the last two months; (2) screenshots older than two months with an attestation that the listings reflected in the screenshots have been checked within the last two months and were active; or (3) evidence of a purchase by a customer in Illinois within the last two months. Second, as relevant to personal jurisdiction, without which any temporary restraining order or asset freeze would be invalid, the declaration must confirm that each named defendant sold at least one allegedly infringing product to a customer in Illinois and describe the evidence supporting this confirmation. Here, "sold" means that the defendant accepted an order and payment for an allegedly infringing product to be shipped to Illinois. Third, to assure that Court that the rights of defendants who have not yet been served are being appropriately protected, the declaration must identify the case number(s) and assigned judge(s) for any pending case(s) brought by the plaintiff(s) against any of the named defendants, noting whether the intellectual property at issue was the same or different than in this case. If it is the same, the declaration should describe the disposition of the other case. The Court will address any motion for a temporary restraining order only after receipt of the described declaration, which can be filed contemporaneously with the motion. Mailed notice.

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Ex parte motion for entry of a temporary restraining order, including a temporary injunction, a temporary asset restraint, and expedited discovery [14] is granted. Motion for electronic service of process pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3) [20] is granted. Mailed notice.

SEALED Temporary Restraining Order. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 9/18/2025. Mailed notice

Registry Deposit Information Form by Dyson Technology Limited

SUMMONS Submitted (Court Participant) for defendant(s) The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited

SUMMONS Issued (Court Participant) as to Defendant The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A