2025-cv-13313

COMPLAINT filed by The AL Agnew Collection LLC; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-24281181.

Exhibit 1

Exhibit 2

Exhibit 3

(Exhibit 4)

SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff The AL Agnew Collection LLC Schedule A to Complaint 1

CIVIL Cover Sheet

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff The AL Agnew Collection LLC by Keith A. Vogt

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff The AL Agnew Collection LLC by Yanling Jiang

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff The AL Agnew Collection LLC by Yi Bu

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff The AL Agnew Collection LLC by Monica Rita Martin

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff The AL Agnew Collection LLC by Christopher Romero

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff The AL Agnew Collection LLC by Cameron Eugene Mcintyre

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff The AL Agnew Collection LLC by Adam Grodman

NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by The AL Agnew Collection LLC

CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Albert Berry, III. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3).

CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.

MOTION by Plaintiff The AL Agnew Collection LLC for leave to file under seal

MOTION by Plaintiff The AL Agnew Collection LLC for leave to file excess pages

MEMORANDUM in support of 14 Exparte motion

Declaration of Keith A. Vogt

Exhibit 1-4, of Keith A. Vogt's declaration

Declaration of Mary Wolk-Agnew

(Exhibit 1, of Mary Wolk-Agnew's declaration)

SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff The AL Agnew Collection LLC Sealed Exhibit 2, Declaration of Mary Wolk-Agnew regarding memorandum in support of motion, 15

(Exhibit 2)

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings: This case has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Jeffrey I. Cummings. Plaintiff's motion for leave to file under seal 12, motion for leave to file excess pages 13, and ex parte motion for a temporary restraining order, including a temporary injunction, a temporary asset restraint, expedited discovery, and for electronic service of process 14 are granted. Plaintiff's submissions establish that, were defendants to learn of these proceedings before the execution of plaintiff's requested preliminary injunctive relief, there is a significant risk that defendants could destroy relevant documentary evidence and hide or transfer assets beyond the reach of the Court. Accordingly, subject to unsealing at an appropriate time, plaintiff may file under seal the documents identified in the motion to seal. The Temporary Restraining Order being entered along with this minute order shall also be placed under seal. In addition, for the purpose of the motions cited above, plaintiff's filings support proceeding on an ex parte basis at this time. Specifically, and as noted above, were defendants to be informed of this proceeding before a TRO could issue, the Court finds that it is likely that their assets and websites would be redirected, thus defeating plaintiff's interests in identifying defendants, stopping defendants' infringing conduct, and obtaining an accounting. In addition, the evidence submitted by plaintiff shows a likelihood of success on the merits (including evidence of active infringement and sales into Illinois), that the harm to plaintiff is irreparable, and that an injunction is in the public interest. An injunction serves the public interest because of the consumer confusion caused by counterfeit goods, and there is no countervailing harm to defendants from an order directing them to stop infringement. Electronic service of process does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it effectively communicates the pendency of this action to defendants. Expedited discovery is warranted to identify defendants and to implement the asset freeze. Enter Sealed Temporary Restraining Order. Tracking status hearing set for 1/9/26 at 9:00 a.m. (to track the case only, no appearance is required). Mailed notice

SEALED ORDER Signed by the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings on 11/24/2025. Mailed notice

SUMMONS Issued (Court Participant) as to Defendant The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A

SURETY BOND in the amount of $ 10,000 posted by The AL Agnew Collection LLC (document not scanned)

MOTION by Plaintiff The AL Agnew Collection LLC for preliminary injunction

MEMORANDUM by The AL Agnew Collection LLC in support of motion for preliminary injunction 22

Declaration of Keith A. Vogt

(Exhibit 1, Declaration of Keith A. Vogt)

SUMMONS Returned Executed by The AL Agnew Collection LLC as to The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A on 12/2/2025, answer due 12/23/2025.

(Declaration of Service, Keith A. Vogt)

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings: Before the Court is plaintiff's motion for entry of a preliminary injunction 22. In connection with that motion, plaintiff must serve all remaining defendants with the following statement: "The Court has taken the motion for a preliminary injunction under advisement and will consider the motion unopposed if no defendant appears and objects by or before December 17, 2025." If no objections are filed by that date, the Court will consider the motion unopposed. Plaintiff must serve this minute order upon all remaining defendants within one business day of its entry on the docket and must promptly file proof of that service. For the reasons stated in the Court's order entering the TRO, the TRO is extended to and including the date upon which the Court adjudicates the motion for a preliminary injunction. See H-D Mich., LLC v. Hellenic Duty Free Shops S.A., 694 F.3d 827, 843-45 (7th Cir. 2012). Because this extension exceeds the maximum duration for a TRO under Fed.R.Civ.P. 65(b), this extension "becomes in effect a preliminary injunction that is appealable, but the order remains effective." Id. at 844. Mailed notice

CERTIFICATE of Service by Keith A. Vogt on behalf of The AL Agnew Collection LLC regarding text entry, 26