2025-cv-13508

COMPLAINT filed by Kendra Dandy; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-24301233.

(Exhibit 1)

SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Kendra Dandy Schedule A to Complaint 1

CIVIL Cover Sheet

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Kendra Dandy by Keith A. Vogt

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Kendra Dandy by Yanling Jiang

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Kendra Dandy by Yi Bu

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Kendra Dandy by Monica Rita Martin

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Kendra Dandy by Christopher Romero

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Kendra Dandy by Cameron Eugene Mcintyre

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Kendra Dandy by Adam Grodman

CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3).

CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.

MOTION by Plaintiff Kendra Dandy for leave to file Under Seal 2

Amended Schedule A 2 to Complaint by Kendra Dandy

MAILED Copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC.

((List of Copyrights))

MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: This case has been assigned to the calendar of Judge LaShonda A. Hunt. Plaintiff's motion to seal 11 was not noticed for presentment in accordance with this Court's case management procedures. Counsel is reminded to review and comply with all court procedures. For future reference, non-compliant motions may be summarily stricken. Nonetheless, the motion 11 is denied. Plaintiff has filed an amended Schedule A 12 displaying the name of the lone remaining Defendant. Plaintiff therefore has not established exceptional circumstances that would provide any basis for sealing the names of associated defendants listed in its original schedule A 2. See Union Oil Co. of Cal. v. Leavell, 220 F.3d 562, 567-68 (7th Cir. 2000) ("Many a litigant would prefer that the subject matter of a case. be kept from the curious (including its business rivals and customers), but the tradition that litigation is open to the public is of very long standing."). Thus, the request to seal Plaintiff's schedule A 11 is denied. The Clerk of Court is directed, forthwith, to unseal Plaintiff's schedule A 2. The Clerk is also directed to update the docket and case caption, forthwith, to reflect the proper Defendant is "GuangShuiShiLiZhuiLangShangMaoYouXianGongSi," not "The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A." By 11/13/25, Plaintiff is ordered to file a status report proposing next steps in this case, if other appropriate relief has not been sought by that date. Mailed notice