2025-cv-08511

2025-cv-08511 Jennifer Lambein v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A

Date :7/24/2025
BrandJennifer Lambein
Court :Southern District of Illinois
Law FirmKeith

#

Date

Content

1

July 24, 2025

COMPLAINT filed by Jennifer Lambein; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23790701.

Exhibit 1

Exhibit 2

Exhibit 3

(Exhibit 4)

2

July 24, 2025

SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Jennifer Lambein Schedule A to Complaint 1

3

July 24, 2025

CIVIL Cover Sheet

4

July 24, 2025

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jennifer Lambein by Keith A. Vogt

5

July 24, 2025

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jennifer Lambein by Yanling Jiang

6

July 24, 2025

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jennifer Lambein by Adam Grodman

7

July 24, 2025

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jennifer Lambein by Cameron Eugene Mcintyre

8

July 24, 2025

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jennifer Lambein by Monica Rita Martin

9

July 24, 2025

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jennifer Lambein by Yi Bu

10

July 24, 2025

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jennifer Lambein by Christopher Romero

July 24, 2025

CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3).

CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.

11

July 28, 2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr: By 8/1/25, the plaintiff is required to file (1) a listing of all prior online trademark, copyright, or patent infringement cases (also known as "Schedule A" cases) filed in any court in the United States in which it was a plaintiff, and (2) a listing of any of the defendants included in the Schedule A in this case that the plaintiff has previously named as a defendant in any prior complaint or Schedule A case. Mailed notice

13

July 29, 2025

MEMORANDUM in support of 12 Exparte motion

Exhibit 1

Declaration of Keith A. Vogt

(Exhibit 1-2, of Keith A. Vogt's declaration)

14

July 29, 2025

SUPPLEMENT to Supplemental Information in Support of Plaintiffs Motion 12

15

July 30, 2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr: The plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order 12 is taken under advisement. By 8/6/25, the plaintiff is required to supplement its motion with (1) a certification that the plaintiff has not used any of the screenshot evidence supplied in support of its motion in any prior proceeding, and (2) an index that matches each defendant to the screenshots supplied in support of the motion, lists the dates those screenshots were taken, and identifies, on a defendant-by-defendant basis, the specific trademarks each defendant has allegedly infringed. Additionally, upon review of the supporting exhibits, the screenshots do not show a single trademark that was allegedly infringed by each of the defendants listed in the plaintiff's Schedule A, raising a question as to the propriety of joinder. Plaintiff is directed to supplement the TRO motion with a brief explaining why joinder is proper notwithstanding the lack of a single trademark common to all defendants. (In other words, the brief should explain why joinder of claims of infringement of different trademarks is appropriate in this case.) If the brief contains new screenshots, those screenshots must be included in an updated version of the certification and index attached to Plaintiff's TRO motion. Alternatively, the plaintiff may amend its complaint to include only defendants alleged to have violated the same trademark and file a renewed motion for entry of a TRO. Mailed notice

21

Aug. 4, 2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr:Upon review, plaintiff's renewed motion for leave to conduct expedited discovery and electronic service of process 18 is granted. Plaintiff's original motion 12 is denied as moot. Mailed notice

23

Aug. 6, 2025

SUMMONS Issued (Court Participant) as to Defendant The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A

24

Aug. 7, 2025

MAILED copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC. (jn,)

联系我们

企业微信及自我推荐2