2025-cv-14340

2025-cv-14340 Casio Computer Co., Ltd. v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto

Date :11/24/2025
BrandCASIO卡西欧
Court :Northen District of Illinois
Law FirmHSP

#

Date

Document

1

Nov. 24, 2025

COMPLAINT filed by Casio Computer Co., Ltd.; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-24391953.

(Exhibit 1)

2

Nov. 24, 2025

CIVIL Cover Sheet

3

Nov. 24, 2025

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Casio Computer Co., Ltd. by Michael A. Hierl

4

Nov. 24, 2025

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Casio Computer Co., Ltd. by William Benjamin Kalbac

5

Nov. 24, 2025

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Casio Computer Co., Ltd. by Robert Payton Mcmurray

6

Nov. 24, 2025

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Casio Computer Co., Ltd. by John Wilson

7

Nov. 24, 2025

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Casio Computer Co., Ltd. by Elizabeth Aubree Miller

8

Nov. 24, 2025

MOTION by Plaintiff Casio Computer Co., Ltd. to seal document Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal

9

Nov. 24, 2025

SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Casio Computer Co., Ltd. Sealed Schedule A

10

Nov. 24, 2025

NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Casio Computer Co., Ltd.

CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). (qrtr,)

CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (qrtr,)

11

Nov. 24, 2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Motion for leave to file under seal 8 is granted. Mailed notice.

12

Nov. 25, 2025

MOTION by Plaintiff Casio Computer Co., Ltd. Plaintiff's Motion to Transfer Case

13

Nov. 25, 2025

EMAILED Trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA

14

Nov. 25, 2025

EMAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials

15

Nov. 26, 2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Motion to transfer case 12 is granted. Mailed notice.

16

Nov. 26, 2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Minute entry 15 granting the motion to transfer case is vacated. Mailed notice.

17

Dec. 1, 2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Plaintiff has filed a motion to transfer this case to Judge Harjani as related to case 25-cv-10453. Pursuant to Local Rule 40.4, a motion to reassign as related should be filed in case 25-cv-10453 before Judge Harjani. Therefore, Plaintiff's motion to transfer 12 is denied. This case will proceed before Judge Durkin unless Plaintiff makes a motion for reassignment before Judge Harjani and he grants that motion. Mailed notice.

18

Dec. 3, 2025

MOTION by Plaintiff Casio Computer Co., Ltd. to reassign case Plaintiff's Motion to Reassign Case No. 25-cv-14340

Exhibit A

(Exhibit B)

19

Dec. 4, 2025

MOTION by Plaintiff Casio Computer Co., Ltd. to withdraw Plaintiff's Motion to Withdraw Plaintiff's Motion to Reassign Case No. 25-cv-14340

20

Dec. 4, 2025

STATUS Report by Casio Computer Co., Ltd.

21

Dec. 4, 2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Plaintiff's motion to withdraw 19 is granted. The motion to reassign filed on 12/3/2025 18 is withdrawn as filed in error. Mailed notice.

22

Dec. 16, 2025

MOTION by Plaintiff Casio Computer Co., Ltd. for leave to file excess pages Plaintiff's Motion to Exceed Page Limitation

23

Dec. 16, 2025

MOTION by Plaintiff Casio Computer Co., Ltd. for temporary restraining order Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion for Entry of a Temporary Restraining Order, Including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Asset Restraint, Expedited Discovery, and Service of Process by Email and/or Electronic Publication

24

Dec. 16, 2025

MEMORANDUM by Casio Computer Co., Ltd. in support of motion for temporary restraining order, 23

Declaration Paragoso Declaration

Exhibit 1

Declaration Hierl Declaration

Exhibit Hierl Exhibit 1

Exhibit Hierl Exhibit 2

Exhibit Hierl Exhibit 3

(Exhibit Hierl Exhibit 4)

25

Dec. 16, 2025

SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Casio Computer Co., Ltd. Exhibit 2 to Paragoso Declaration regarding memorandum in support of motion, 24

26

Dec. 16, 2025

SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Casio Computer Co., Ltd. Figueroa Declaration

Exhibit A

(Exhibit B)

27

Dec. 16, 2025

SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Casio Computer Co., Ltd. Miller Declaration

28

Dec. 16, 2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: The Court requires that any motion for a temporary restraining order and/or asset freeze is accompanied by a declaration from an attorney of record that provides the following information. First, to demonstrate the immediate harm necessary to grant the drastic remedy of an ex parte temporary restraining order, the declaration must confirm that each named defendant has sold or offered to sell the allegedly infringing product(s) within the last two months and describe the evidence supporting this confirmation. Generally, evidence that a defendant has sold or offered to sell the infringing products within the last two months may include: (1) screenshots of the listings collected within the last two months; (2) screenshots older than two months with an attestation that the listings reflected in the screenshots have been checked within the last two months and were active; or (3) evidence of a purchase by a customer in Illinois within the last two months. Second, as relevant to personal jurisdiction, without which any temporary restraining order or asset freeze would be invalid, the declaration must confirm that each named defendant sold at least one allegedly infringing product to a customer in Illinois and describe the evidence supporting this confirmation. Here, "sold" means that the defendant accepted an order and payment for an allegedly infringing product to be shipped to Illinois. Third, to assure that Court that the rights of defendants who have not yet been served are being appropriately protected, the declaration must identify the case number(s) and assigned judge(s) for any pending case(s) brought by the plaintiff(s) against any of the named defendants, noting whether the intellectual property at issue was the same or different than in this case. If it is the same, the declaration should describe the disposition of the other case. The Court will address any motion for a temporary restraining order only after receipt of the described declaration, which can be filed contemporaneously with the motion. Additionally, to the extent Plaintiff also makes a motion for expedited discovery or for an order permitting electronic service of process, Plaintiff should submit a proposed order for that relief that is separate from the proposed order for the TRO and asset restraint. The proposed order for the TRO and asset restraint should name the relevant defendants directly in the order, without reference to Schedule A. Mailed notice.

29

Dec. 17, 2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Motion to exceed page limitation 22 is granted. Ex parte motion for entry of a temporary restraining order, including a temporary injunction, a temporary asset restraint, expedited discovery, and service of process by email and/or electronic publication 23 is granted. Mailed notice.

30

Dec. 17, 2025

SEALED Temporary Restraining Order. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 12/17/2025. Mailed notice.

32

Dec. 17, 2025

SUMMONS Issued (Court Participant) as to Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto

33

Dec. 23, 2025

MOTION by Plaintiff Casio Computer Co., Ltd. for extension of time Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion to Extend the Temporary Restraining Order

34

Dec. 23, 2025

SURETY BOND in the amount of $1,000.00 posted by Casio Computer Co., Ltd. (Document not scanned). (bi,)

35

Dec. 23, 2025

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Ex parte motion to extend the Temporary Restraining Order 33 is granted. The TRO is extended for a period of fourteen (14) days to and including 1/14/2026. Mailed notice.

36

Dec. 31, 2025

ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates), any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this LINK will provide additional information. Signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 12/31/2025: Mailed notice.

联系我们

企业微信及自我推荐2