2025-cv-14456

COMPLAINT filed by Casio Computer Co., Ltd.; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-24404071.

Exhibit 1

(Exhibit 2)

CIVIL Cover Sheet

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Casio Computer Co., Ltd. by Michael A. Hierl

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Casio Computer Co., Ltd. by William Benjamin Kalbac

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Casio Computer Co., Ltd. by Robert Payton Mcmurray

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Casio Computer Co., Ltd. by John Wilson

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Casio Computer Co., Ltd. by Elizabeth Aubree Miller

MOTION by Plaintiff Casio Computer Co., Ltd. to seal document Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal

SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Casio Computer Co., Ltd. Sealed Schedule A

NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Casio Computer Co., Ltd.

CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Laura K. McNally. Case assignment: Direct assignment. (Civil Category 2).

CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.

MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA

MAILED patent report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA

MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials

MOTION by Plaintiff Casio Computer Co., Ltd. for leave to file excess pages Plaintiff's Motion to Exceed Page Limitation

MOTION by Plaintiff Casio Computer Co., Ltd. for temporary restraining order Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion for Entry of a Temporary Restraining Order, Including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Asset Restraint, Expedited Discovery, and Service of Process by Email and/or Electronic Publication

MEMORANDUM by Casio Computer Co., Ltd. in support of motion for temporary restraining order, 15

Declaration Paragoso Declaration

Exhibit 1

Exhibit 2

Declaration Hierl Declaration

Exhibit Hierl Exhibit 1

Exhibit Hierl Exhibit 2

Exhibit Hierl Exhibit 3

(Exhibit Hierl Exhibit 4)

SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Casio Computer Co., Ltd. Exhibit 3 to Paragoso Declaration regarding memorandum in support of motion, 16

SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Casio Computer Co., Ltd. Figueroa Declaration

(Exhibit A)

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Plaintiff represents on the civil cover sheet 2 that "This case is a refiling of case number 25-CV-10453 previously dismissed by Judge Harjani." Upon review of the record in 25-CV-10453, the case was not dismissed by Judge Harjani. In 25-CV-10453, the Plaintiff filed an amended complaint on 10/3/2025 against a single defendant and proceeded to litigate the matter until a final judgment was entered on 12/3/2025. Plaintiff identified incorrect information in the civil cover sheet. As such, this case has been improperly assigned to Judge Harjani under Local Rule 40.3(b)(2) because it is not a refiling of a dismissed case. The Clerk is directed to reassign this case pursuant to Local Rule 40.2(a). Plaintiff is cautioned to ensure this does not happen again in future cases. Mailed notice

MINUTE entry before the Executive Committee: Pursuant to the entry by the Hon. Sunil R. Harjani on December 5, 2025, the cases listed below were identified as improperly assigned to him, under Local Rule 40.3(b)(2); therefore IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the Clerk of Court shall reassign the cases listed below, pursuant to Local Rule 40.2(a), in accordance with procedures approved by the Court. Mailed notice

(Request for Reassignment)

MINUTE entry before the Honorable April M. Perry: Plaintiff's motions to seal 8 and to exceed the page limitation 14 are granted. Plaintiff's motion for an ex parte temporary restraining order 15 is denied without prejudice. In order to be entitled to equitable relief like a TRO, the Plaintiff must show (among other things) that there is ongoing or impending harm. Swanigan v. City of Chicago, 881 F.3d 577, 583 n. 2 (7th Cir. 2018). "Past injury alone is insufficient." Simic v. City of Chicago, 851 F.3d 734, 738 (7th Cir. 2017). Plaintiff's exhibits in support of its argument of ongoing harm in this case are from December 2024, January 2025, and February 2025. This is not sufficient evidence of ongoing harm. Should Plaintiff re-file for a TRO, it is encouraged to submit live weblinks along with recent screenshots of the alleged infringement in support of its argument that it is subject to ongoing harm. Mailed notice. (jcc,)

MOTION by Plaintiff Casio Computer Co., Ltd. Plaintiff's Motion for Electronic Service of Process Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3)

MOTION by Plaintiff Casio Computer Co., Ltd. to expedite Plaintiff's Motion for Expedited Discovery

NOTICE of Motion by Michael A. Hierl for presentment of motion for miscellaneous relief 22, motion to expedite 23 before Honorable April M. Perry on 1/6/2026 at 10:00 AM.

MINUTE entry before the Honorable April M. Perry: Plaintiff's motions for Electronic Service of Process 22 and Expedited Discovery 23 are granted. Electronic service of process does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it is an effective way to communicate with an online marketplace defendant. Expedited discovery is warranted to identify defendant. Because electronic service is being permitted, Plaintiff is directed to effectuate that service within 30 days or to file a status report with the Court within 30 days explaining why it is unable to do so. The Court strikes the motion hearing set for 1/6/2026. Enter order. Mailed notice. (jcc,)

ORDER for Leave to Conduct Expedited Discovery and Service of Process by E-Mail and/or Electronic Publication. Signed by the Honorable April M. Perry on 12/29/2025. Mailed notice. (jcc,)

ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates), any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this LINK will provide additional information. Signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 12/31/2025: Mailed notice.

SUMMONS Issued (Court Participant) as to Defendant Foshan Yuejianshi Watch Co., Ltd.