2026-cv-01448

COMPLAINT filed by Rongzhen Xuan; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-24700991.

Exhibit Trademark registration

Exhibit Schedule A

(Exhibit Genuine Listing)

SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Rongzhen Xuan Trademark Registration regarding complaint 1

SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Rongzhen Xuan Schedule A regarding complaint 1

SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Rongzhen Xuan Genuine Listing regarding complaint 1

MOTION by Plaintiff Rongzhen Xuan for leave to file under seal

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Rongzhen Xuan by Wengang He

CIVIL Cover Sheet

MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA

MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials

CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Keri L. Holleb Hotaling. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2).

CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Rongzhen The Court grants the motion to seal 5, but upon review of the complaint, the court sua sponte raises the propriety of joining 70 defendants in a single action. By February 18, 2026, plaintiff must file a supplemental memorandum addressing the propriety of joinder. In the alternative, plaintiff has leave to file an amended complaint by February 18, 2026 with a smaller subset of defendants along with a memorandum explaining why that smaller subset of defendants is properly joined. No motion for an ex parte temporary restraining order should be filed in this matter without counsel first consulting the opinion issued in Wham-O Holding v. The Partnerships, 24 CV 12523, Dkt. 39 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 20, 2025) (Alexakis, J.). Emailed notice

AMENDED complaint by Rongzhen Xuan against The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A

Exhibit Amended Schedule A

(Exhibit Redline Amended Complaint)

MEMORANDUM in support of Ex Parte Motion for leave to conduct expedited discovery 12

(Exhibit Screenshot of Store)

MOTION by Plaintiff Rongzhen Xuan Electronic Service of Process Pursuant to FRCP 4(f)(3)

Declaration of Wengang He in Support of Motion for Electronic Service

Exhibit 1 of He's Declaration

(Exhibit 2 of He's Declaration)

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: The clerk is directed to update the case caption to reflect that Defendant is "Alpha Infuse Store." The motion for electronic service 14 and for expedited discovery 12 are granted. Separate order to issue. Mailed notice

ORDER FOR LEAVE TO CONDUCT EXPEDITED DISCOVERY AND SERVICE OFPROCESS BY E-MAIL AND/OR ELECTRONIC PUBLICATION Signed by the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins on 2/12/2026. Mailed notice