Banks v. Liberty Surplus Insurance Corporation et al

MOTION by Defendant Liberty Surplus Insurance Corporation for extension of time to file answer regarding notice of removal, [1] Joint Motion for EOT to File Answer or Otherwise Plead regarding Complaint in Exhibit 1-1

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer

Remand

Appear

Order on Motion for Leave to Appear

Extension of Time to File Answer

Extension of Time to File Response/Reply

Withdraw as Attorney

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: Defendants' motion [16] for extension of time to answer the complaint and respond to the motion to remand is granted. Defendants are to respond to the motion to remand by 4/13/26 and to answer or otherwise plead in response to the complaint by 4/14/26. Plaintiff's deadline to reply in support of the motion to remand is extended to 4/28/26. Attorney Thomas E. Placzek's motion [17] to withdraw is granted; Attorney Placzek is terminated as counsel of record. Mailed notice.

REQUEST by Plaintiff Larry Maurice Banks for judicial notice (Received at the Intake Counter on 3/27/2026)

Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim

Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim

Miscellaneous Relief

Order on Motion to Remand

Leave to File Document

Order on Motion for Leave to File

MOTION by Plaintiff Larry Maurice Banks UNOPPOSED MOTION TO MODIFY July 14 2026 scheduling Posture, and for prompt separate determination of the pending motion to remand. (Received by mail in the Clerk's Office on 7/17/26, Envelope post marked 7/15/26.)

Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief

MOTION by Plaintiff Larry Maurice Banks for status update and prompt determination of pending motion to remand pursuant to 28 U.S.C. � 1441, 1446, and 1447(c), article III of the united states constitution, and controlling supreme court and seventh circuit authority. (Received at intake 10/14/2026) (Previously unavailable foe docketed. Motion was not docketed with the notice.)

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: The Court has reviewed Plaintiff's second motion for a status update and to modify the Court's 7/14/2026 order [45] [46] is denied as moot. The Court has indicated that it will rule on Plaintiff's motion to remand prior to considering Defendants' motions to dismiss. Filing motions for a status update only serves to distract the court from ruling on the substantive motions pending before it. Mailed notice.