2026-cv-02459

COMPLAINT filed by Robert Bosch LLC; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-24807559.

(Exhibit 1)

CIVIL Cover Sheet

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Robert Bosch LLC by Michael A. Hierl

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Robert Bosch LLC by William Benjamin Kalbac

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Robert Bosch LLC by Robert Payton Mcmurray

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Robert Bosch LLC by John Wilson

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Robert Bosch LLC by Elizabeth Aubree Miller

MOTION by Plaintiff Robert Bosch LLC to seal document Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal

SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Robert Bosch LLC Sealed Schedule A

NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Robert Bosch LLC

CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Daniel P. McLaughlin. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2).

CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.

MAILED Trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA

MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials

MOTION by Plaintiff Robert Bosch LLC for leave to file excess pages Plaintiff's Motion to Exceed Page Limitation

MOTION by Plaintiff Robert Bosch LLC for temporary restraining order Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion for Entry of a Temporary Restraining Order, Including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Asset Restraint, Expedited Discovery, and Service of Process by Email and/or Electronic Publication

MEMORANDUM by Robert Bosch LLC in support of motion for temporary restraining order, 14

Declaration Paragoso Declaration

Exhibit 1

Declaration Hierl Declaration

Exhibit Hierl Exhibit 1

Exhibit Hierl Exhibit 2

Exhibit Hierl Exhibit 3

(Exhibit Hierl Exhibit 4)

SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Robert Bosch LLC Exhibit 2 to Paragoso Declaration regarding memorandum in support of motion, 15

NOTICE of Motion by Michael A. Hierl for presentment of motion for temporary restraining order, 14, motion to seal document 8, motion for leave to file excess pages 13 before Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings on 3/19/2026 at 10:00 AM.

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings: Plaintiffs' motions are taken under advisement. The 3/19/26 motion hearing is stricken, no appearance is required. Mailed notice

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings: This case has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Jeffrey I. Cummings. Plaintiff's motion for leave to file under seal 8 is granted. However, plaintiff's motion for leave to file excess pages 13 and motion for TRO 14 are denied without prejudice in light of the Seventh Circuit's opinion in Liu v. Monthly, No. 25-2074, --- F.4th ----, 2026 WL 880018 (7th Cir. Mar. 31, 2026). In Liu, the Court vacated the district court's entry of default judgment because the "evidence upon which the district court relied for establishing personal jurisdiction showed only that it was possible to order the defendants' products and have them shipped to Illinois, not that such sales took place." Id. at *2. Specifically, the evidence in Liu consisted "of screenshots of [defendant seller's] website showing the checkout page with the infringing product, a Chicago shipping address, and the estimated total, but not a completed purchase." Id. Relying on NBA Props., Inc. v. HANWJH, 46 F.4th 614, 620 (7th Cir. 2022) and Curry v. Revolution Lab'ys, LLC, 949 F.3d 385, 400 (7th Cir. 2020), the Seventh Circuit explained that such evidence was insufficient to establish personal jurisdiction. Here, plaintiff has submitted the same type of evidence, i.e., screenshots of defendant's website showing the checkout page, but not a completed purchase. (Dckt. #16). Accordingly, before this case may proceed, plaintiff must file either an amended complaint or a supplemental submission establishing a basis for personal jurisdiction over the defendant. If an amended complaint or supplemental statement consistent with this order and Seventh Circuit precedent is not filed by 4/24/26, this action may be dismissed without prejudice for lack of personal jurisdiction. See Enduring Love Int'l Church v. Williams, No. 23-CV-1120-PP, 2024 WL 3553979, at *2 (E.D.Wis. July 26, 2024) ("Although sua sponte dismissal of claims for lack of personal jurisdiction is generally disfavored, district courts retain discretion to depart from that principle"). Tracking status hearing set for 5/29/26 at 9:00 a.m. (to track the case only, no appearance is required). Mailed notice