Glitch Productions Pty Ltd v. The Partnerships And Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A,

COMPLAINT filed by Glitch Productions Pty Ltd; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-25055050.

Exhibit 1

Exhibit 2

Exhibit 3

Exhibit 4

Exhibit 5

SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Glitch Productions Pty Ltd Schedule A regarding complaint 1

MOTION by Plaintiff Glitch Productions Pty Ltd for Leave to File Certain Documents Under Seal

CIVIL Cover Sheet

NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Glitch Productions Pty Ltd

Notice of Claims Involving Trademarks by Glitch Productions Pty Ltd

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Glitch Productions Pty Ltd by Martin Francis Trainor

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Glitch Productions Pty Ltd by Alexander Whang

CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Daniel P. McLaughlin. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). (Text entry; no document attached.)

CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (Text entry; no document attached.)

MAILED Trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA

MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials

NEW PARTIES: biataf-0 added to case caption. Terminating The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A (Text entry; no document attached.)

Notice of Withdrawal of Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal by Glitch Productions Pty Ltd

AMENDED complaint by Glitch Productions Pty Ltd against biataf-0

Exhibit 1

Exhibit 2

Exhibit 3

Exhibit 4

Exhibit 5

Exhibit Schedule A

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Plaintiff's motion to seal [3] is withdrawn and therefore stricken. See [11]. Mailed notice

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Upon review of the amended complaint, the Court sua sponte raises the issue of whether the Court has specific personal jurisdiction over the defendant. Evidence "that it was possible to order the defendants' products and have them shipped to Illinois," including screenshots of the defendant's "website showing the checkout page with the infringing product, a Chicago shipping address, and the estimated total," but without evidence of a completed purchase is insufficient. Liu v. Monthly, 170 F.4th 1090, 1093 (7th Cir. 2026). By 5/28/2026, plaintiff shall file supplemental evidence showing a sale within the jurisdiction or a status report stating its basis to continue this case without such sale. Also, the Court advises Plaintiff that no motion for an ex parte temporary restraining order should be filed in this matter without counsel first evaluating whether a restraint of assets would capture more than sales from the allegedly infringing products. A court cannot impose an asset restraint "simply to establish a fund from which a later award of money damages can be satisfied." See Banister v. Firestone, No. 17 C 8940, 2018 WL 4224444, at *9 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 5, 2018); see also Wham-O Holding v. The Partnerships, 24 CV 12523, Dkt. 39 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 20, 2025). Mailed notice