Christian Dior Couture, S.A. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A

COMPLAINT filed by Christian Dior Couture, S.A.; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-25383978.

Exhibit 1

SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Christian Dior Couture, S.A. Schedule A regarding complaint[1]

SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Christian Dior Couture, S.A. Exhibit 2 Parts 1-3 regarding complaint[1]

Exhibit 2-1

Exhibit 2-2

(Exhibit 2-3)

MOTION by Plaintiff Christian Dior Couture, S.A. for leave to file under seal

CIVIL Cover Sheet

NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Christian Dior Couture, S.A.

Notice of Claims Involving Trademarks by Christian Dior Couture, S.A.

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Christian Dior Couture, S.A. by Justin R. Gaudio

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Christian Dior Couture, S.A. by Amy Crout Ziegler

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Christian Dior Couture, S.A. by Jennifer Van Nacht

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Christian Dior Couture, S.A. by Hannah Alexa Abes

CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Laura K. McNally. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2).

CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.

MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA

MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Upon review of the complaint, the Court sua sponte raises the propriety of joining more than 100 defendants in a single action. By July 22, 2026, plaintiff must file a supplemental memorandum addressing the propriety of joinder. In the alternative, plaintiff has leave to file an amended complaint by July 22 2026 with a smaller subset of defendants along with a memorandum explaining why that smaller subset of defendants is properly joined. No motion for an ex parte temporary restraining order should be filed in this matter without counsel first consulting the opinion issued in Wham-O Holding v. The Partnerships, 24 CV 12523, Dkt. 39 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 20, 2025) (Alexakis, J.). Mailed notice.