Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A

案件号:2026-cv-08990

起诉日期:2026年7月29日

品牌方: Harry Potter 哈利波特

起诉地点:Northen District of Illinois

代理律所: TME

#

Date

Document

1

July 29, 2026

COMPLAINT filed by Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-25450249.

Exhibit 1

Exhibit 2

Exhibit 3

Exhibit 4

Exhibit 5

2

July 29, 2026

SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. Schedule A regarding complaint[1]

3

July 29, 2026

MOTION by Plaintiff Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. for Leave to File Certain Documents Under Seal

4

July 29, 2026

CIVIL Cover Sheet

5

July 29, 2026

NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.

6

July 29, 2026

Notice of Claims Involving Trademarks by Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.

7

July 29, 2026

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. by Martin Francis Trainor

8

July 29, 2026

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. by Alexander Whang

9

July 29, 2026

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. by Victor Benjamin Chahin, Jr

CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Daniel P. McLaughlin. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2).

CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.

10

July 30, 2026

MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA.

Trademarks

11

July 30, 2026

MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials.

12

Aug. 4, 2026

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: Motion to file documents under seal [3] is granted. Mailed notice.

13

Aug. 5, 2026

MOTION by Plaintiff Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. for Entry of a Temporary Restraining Order, Including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Asset Restraint, and Expedited Discovery

14

Aug. 5, 2026

MEMORANDUM by Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. in support of motion for miscellaneous relief[13]

Declaration of Martin F. Trainor

Exhibit 1

15

Aug. 5, 2026

DECLARATION of Robert Johns regarding memorandum in support of motion[14]

Exhibit 1

Exhibit 2

16

Aug. 5, 2026

SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. Exhibit 3, Parts 1-14 regarding declaration[15]

17

Aug. 5, 2026

MOTION by Plaintiff Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. for Authorization to Provide Electronic Notice of Any Forthcoming Motion for Entry of a Preliminary Injunction

18

Sept. 28, 2026

ORDER: For the reasons stated herein, the Court denies Plaintiff's ex parte motion for entry of a temporary restraining order [13]. Plaintiff is to file a status report by October 15, 2026. Signed by the Honorable Mary M. Rowland on 9/28/2026. Mailed notice.

19

Sept. 29, 2026

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: Plaintiff's motion to serve any forthcoming motion for preliminary injunction via electronic means [17] is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff requests the Court to allow electronic service "after it (1) receives expedited discovery from the third-party providers who are providing services to the Defendants and (2) verifies that Defendants' physical addresses are unknown." [17] at 1-2. The motion is denied because it is not ripe. Plaintiff is attempting to comply with Kongol, LLC v. Hangzhou Chuanyue Silk Import & Export Co., Ltd., 177 F.4th 793 (7th Cir. 2026). The Plaintiff needs to explore whether each of the Defendants' addresses are known or not prior to making this request. Mailed notice.

联系我们

企业微信及自我推荐3