Robert Bosch GmbH et al v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A to the Complaint

案件号:2026-cv-03986

起诉日期:2026年5月13日

品牌方: BOSCH 博世

起诉地点:Southern District of New York

代理律所: Whitewood

#

Date

Document

1

May 13, 2026

COMPLAINT against The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A to the Complaint. (Filing Fee $ 405.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-32844870)Document filed by Robert Bosch GmbH, Robert Bosch LLC.

(Exhibit 1 - Trademark Registrations)

2

May 13, 2026

CIVIL COVER SHEET filed.

3

May 13, 2026

AO 120 FORM TRADEMARK - NOTICE OF SUBMISSION BY ATTORNEY. AO 120 Form Patent/Trademark for case opening submitted to court for review.

4

May 13, 2026

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Keaton David Smith on behalf of Robert Bosch GmbH, Robert Bosch LLC.

CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Jeannette A. Vargas. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions.

Magistrate Judge Valerie Figueredo is designated to handle matters that may be referred in this case. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf.

Case Designated ECF.

5

May 14, 2026

AO 120 FORM TRADEMARK - CASE OPENING - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 15 U.S.C. 1116, the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is hereby advised that a court action has been filed on the following trademark(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office electronically notified via Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF).

6

May 14, 2026

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Shengmao Mu on behalf of Robert Bosch GmbH, Robert Bosch LLC.

CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Jeannette A. Vargas. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions.

7

May 22, 2026

MOTION to Seal certain documents. Document filed by Robert Bosch GmbH, Robert Bosch LLC.

8

May 22, 2026

***SEALED***REDACTION to 1 Complaint, Complaint containing Defendant information and Schedule A by Robert Bosch GmbH, Robert Bosch LLCMotion or Order to File Under Seal: 7. (Main Document 8 replaced on 8/26/2026)

9

May 22, 2026

MOTION for Discovery. Document filed by Robert Bosch GmbH, Robert Bosch LLC.

10

May 22, 2026

MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 9 MOTION for Discovery. Document filed by Robert Bosch GmbH, Robert Bosch LLC.

11

May 22, 2026

PROPOSED ORDER. Document filed by Robert Bosch GmbH, Robert Bosch LLC. Related Document Number: 9. Proposed Order to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.

***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING PROPOSED ORDER. Document No. 11 Proposed Order was reviewed and approved as to form.

12

June 1, 2026

ORDER granting 9 Motion for Discovery. Accordingly, Plaintiffs' Motion is GRANTED and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. As sufficient cause has been shown, within fourteen (14) days of receipt of service of this Order, the Financial Institutions and Domain Registrars1 shall provide the following information to Plaintiffs' counsel (to the extent such information is in the Financial Institutions' and Domain Registrars' possession, custody, or control): as further set forth in this Order. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate ECF No. 9. (Signed by Judge Jeannette A. Vargas on 6/1/2026)

13

June 12, 2026

ORDER granting 7 Letter Motion to Seal. For the reasons stated therein, the Motion to Seal is GRANTED until further Order of this Court. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file a letter regarding the continuing need for sealing when (1) there is no longer a need to keep the matter under seal or (2) within 28 days of this Order, whichever is earlier. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate ECF No. 7. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jeannette A. Vargas on 6/12/2026)

14

Aug. 24, 2026

LETTER addressed to Judge Jeannette A. Vargas from Keaton Smith dated 8/24/2026 re: Seal Order and Motion for Electronic Service. Document filed by Robert Bosch GmbH, Robert Bosch LLC.

15

Aug. 26, 2026

UNSEALING ORDER In light of Plaintiffs' notification that the seal is no longer required, the Court hereby ORDERS that the documents filed at ECF No. 8 on this case's docket be unsealed. The Clerk of Court is directed to unseal and make publicly available ECF No. 8. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jeannette A. Vargas on 8/26/2026)

16

Sept. 11, 2026

MOTION to Serve Defendants via email. Document filed by Robert Bosch GmbH, Robert Bosch LLC.

17

Sept. 11, 2026

MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 16 MOTION to Serve Defendants via email. Document filed by Robert Bosch GmbH, Robert Bosch LLC.

18

Sept. 11, 2026

DECLARATION of Yingchun Hou in Support re: 16 MOTION to Serve Defendants via email. Document filed by Robert Bosch GmbH, Robert Bosch LLC.

(Exhibit 1 - Address Verification)

19

Sept. 11, 2026

PROPOSED ORDER. Document filed by Robert Bosch GmbH, Robert Bosch LLC. Related Document Number: 16. Proposed Order to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.

***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING PROPOSED ORDER. Document No. 19 Proposed Order was reviewed and approved as to form.

***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING PROPOSED ORDER. Document No. [19] Proposed Order was reviewed and approved as to form.

20

Sept. 25, 2026

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice against the defendant(s) congcongdianzi. Document filed by Robert Bosch GmbH, Robert Bosch LLC. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers).

***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Document No. [20] Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, was reviewed and referred to Judge Jeannette A. Vargas for approval for the following reason(s): the plaintiff(s) filed their voluntary dismissal and it did not dismiss all of the parties or the action in its entirety.

***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Document No. 20 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, was reviewed and referred to Judge Jeannette A. Vargas for approval for the following reason(s): the plaintiff(s) filed their voluntary dismissal and it did not dismiss all of the parties or the action in its entirety.

***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Document No. [20] Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, was reviewed and referred to Judge Jeannette A. Vargas for approval for the following reason(s): the plaintiff(s) filed their voluntary dismissal and it did not dismiss all of the parties or the action in its entirety.

21

Sept. 30, 2026

PLAINTIFFS' NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL: Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiffs herebydismiss without prejudice all causes of action in the Complaint against the following Defendantidentified in Schedule A to the Complaint: as further set forth within. Each patty shall bear their own attorney's fees and costs. Defendant has not filed an answer or a motion for Summary judgment in this matter. Therefore, it is respectfully submitted that dismissal under Rule 41 (a)(1)(A)(i) is appropriate. The case shall remain against other named Defendants identified in Schedule A to the Complaint. SO ORDERED. The Clerk of Court is directed to not close this case. congcongdianzi terminated. (Signed by Judge Jeannette A. Vargas on 9/30/2026)

联系我们

企业微信及自我推荐3