EDGAR RICE BURROUGHS, INC. v. SCHEDULE A DEFENDANTS

案件号:2026-cv-02163

起诉日期:2026年10月2日

品牌方: Tarzan(人猿泰山)

起诉地点:Western District of Pennsylvania

代理律所: Whitewood

#

Date

Document

1

Oct. 2, 2026

COMPLAINT against SCHEDULE A DEFENDANTS (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $405, receipt number APAWDC-9920197), filed by EDGAR RICE BURROUGHS, INC.

Civil Cover Sheet

Exhibit 1 - Trademark Registration

2

Oct. 2, 2026

MOTION for Leave to File Documents Under Seal by EDGAR RICE BURROUGHS, INC.

(Proposed Order)

3

Oct. 2, 2026

MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order, MOTION to Expedite Discovery, MOTION for Order to Show Cause by EDGAR RICE BURROUGHS, INC.

(Proposed Order)

4

Oct. 2, 2026

BRIEF in Support re 3 Motion for TRO, Motion to Expedite, Motion for Order to Show Cause filed by EDGAR RICE BURROUGHS, INC.

Declaration of Jay Harvey Paragoso

(Declaration of Keaton Smith)

5

Oct. 2, 2026

MOTION for Alternative Service by EDGAR RICE BURROUGHS, INC.

(Proposed Order)

6

Oct. 2, 2026

BRIEF in Support re [5] Motion for Alternative Service filed by EDGAR RICE BURROUGHS, INC.

7

Oct. 2, 2026

MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages by EDGAR RICE BURROUGHS, INC.

Proposed Order

8

Oct. 2, 2026

Disclosure Statement identifying None as corporate parent or other affiliate, declaring citizenship by EDGAR RICE BURROUGHS, INC.

9

Oct. 2, 2026

NOTICE of Appearance by Keaton David Smith on behalf of EDGAR RICE BURROUGHS, INC.

Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan presiding.

10

Oct. 2, 2026

PATENT/TRADEMARK DOCUMENTS ISSUED.

11

Oct. 5, 2026

ORDER denying 2 Motion for Leave to File Documents Under Seal without prejudice, allowing Plaintiff to refile Motion with sufficient particularity as to good cause for proceeding under seal. At present, the Court finds that Plaintiff has failed to show good cause for proceeding under seal because it has not stated, with any particularity, that the Defendants in this particular case have improperly transferred assets to avoid judgment or have even in prior instances engaged in such improper conduct. Generalized allegations about counterfeiter Defendants do not suffice. Plaintiff may refile its Motion to File under Seal with sufficient particularity; for example, Plaintiff may show that these particular Defendants have a track record of moving assets or changing names or addresses, or have engaged in other conduct to avoid seizure of any ill-gotten gains. Signed by Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan on 10/5/2026. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter.

12

Oct. 5, 2026

ORDER denying 3 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, Order Restraining Assets and Merchant Storefronts, Order to Show Cause Why a Preliminary Injunction Should not Issue, and Order Authorizing Expedited Discovery without prejudice to the filing of a renewed motion once the "sealing" issue has been resolved. Signed by Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan on 10/5/2026. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter.

13

Oct. 5, 2026

ORDER FOR ADMINISTRATIVE CLOSING. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk mark the above-captioned case closed; that nothing contained in this order shall be considered a dismissal or disposition of this action; and that, should further proceedings therein become necessary or desirable, any party may initiate the same in the same manner as if this order had not been entered. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions (ECF 5, 7) will be held in abeyance while the case is closed, and will be reinstated for consideration by the Court if and when the case is re-opened. Signed by Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan on 10/5/2026. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter.

Order on Motion for Leave to File Documents Under Seal

Order on Motion to Show Cause

Order on Motion to Expedite

Order on Motion for TRO

Order for Administrative Case Closing

联系我们

企业微信及自我推荐3