2026-cv-01352

COMPLAINT filed by Swarovski Aktiengesellschaft, Swarovski North America Limited; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-24692916.

Exhibit 1

SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiffs Swarovski Aktiengesellschaft, Swarovski North America Limited Schedule A regarding complaint[1]

SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiffs Swarovski Aktiengesellschaft, Swarovski North America Limited Exhibit 2 regarding complaint[1]

MOTION by Plaintiffs Swarovski Aktiengesellschaft, Swarovski North America Limited for leave to file under Seal

CIVIL Cover Sheet

NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Swarovski Aktiengesellschaft, Swarovski North America Limited

Notice of Claims Involving Trademarks by Swarovski Aktiengesellschaft, Swarovski North America Limited

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Swarovski Aktiengesellschaft, Swarovski North America Limited by Justin R. Gaudio

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Swarovski Aktiengesellschaft, Swarovski North America Limited by Amy Crout Ziegler

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Swarovski Aktiengesellschaft, Swarovski North America Limited by Marcella Deshonda Slay

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Swarovski Aktiengesellschaft, Swarovski North America Limited by Thomas Joseph Juettner

CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Maria Valdez. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2).

CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.

EMAILED Trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA

MOTION by Plaintiffs Swarovski Aktiengesellschaft, Swarovski North America Limited for temporary restraining order including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Asset Restraint, and Expedited Discovery

MEMORANDUM by Swarovski Aktiengesellschaft, Swarovski North America Limited in support of motion for temporary restraining order[13]

DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion[14]

DECLARATION of Gerard Bareille regarding memorandum in support of motion[14]

Exhibit 1

SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiffs Swarovski Aktiengesellschaft, Swarovski North America Limited Exhibit 2 regarding declaration[16]

MOTION by Plaintiffs Swarovski Aktiengesellschaft, Swarovski North America Limited for Electronic Service of Process Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3)

MEMORANDUM by Swarovski Aktiengesellschaft, Swarovski North America Limited in support of motion for miscellaneous relief[18]

DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion[19]

NOTICE of Motion by Justin R. Gaudio for presentment of motion for miscellaneous relief[18], motion for temporary restraining order[13], motion for leave to file[4] before Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 2/12/2026 at 09:30 AM.

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso: Plaintiff's ex parte motions [4] [13] [18] are granted, and no appearance is necessary. The plaintiff's written submissions establish that if defendants were informed of this proceeding before a TRO could issue, assets would likely be redirected, defeating plaintiff's interests in identifying defendants, stopping the infringement, and obtaining an accounting. In addition, the submitted evidence establishes a likelihood of success on the merits, the harm to plaintiff is irreparable and an injunction is in the public interest because infringement interferes with the plaintiff's ability to control its intellectual property. Those rights cannot be fully compensated by money damages. There is no countervailing harm to defendants from an order directing them to stop infringement. Electronic service of process does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it is an effective, perhaps the most effective, way to communicate with defendants. Expedited discovery is warranted to identify defendants and implement the asset freeze. If any defendant were to appear and object, the court will take a fresh look at the asset freeze, joinder, and personal jurisdiction. The court finds that security in the amount of $53,000$1,000 per defendantis sufficient to secure the injunctive relief. Motion hearing set for 2/12/26 is stricken. Notice mailed by Judge's staff

SEALED TEMPORARY Restraining Order. Signed by the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 2/12/2026. Notice mailed by Judge's staff

SEALED ORDER Authorizing Expedited Discovery And Electronic Service Of Process. Signed by the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 2/12/2026. Notice mailed by Judge's staff